Who gives a veg? Relations between personality and Vegetarianism/Veganism

被引:27
作者
Tan, Nicholas P. [1 ]
Conner, Tamlin S. [2 ]
Sun, Haisu [1 ]
Loughnan, Steven [3 ]
Smillie, Luke D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Vegetarianism; Veganism; Personality; Agreeableness; Openness; intellect; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; EATING HABITS; MEAT; VEGETARIANS; TRAITS; FACETS; MOTIVATION; DOMAINS; VALUES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.appet.2021.105195
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
With rates of vegetarianism and veganism (i.e., veg*nism) rising around the world, a growing body of research has begun to explore psychological characteristics that distinguish vegetarians and vegans from omnivores. However, relatively few studies have examined how veg*nism is related to differences in basic personality traits such as the "Big Five", with those that have tending to yield conflicting results. Moreover, none of these studies have examined personality at the lower levels of the personality trait hierarchy (i.e., aspects and facets of the Big Five). Thus, we sought to clarify how personality traits are related to veg*nism. In Study 1, comprising two samples (S1a: N = 797, S1b: N = 1534), participants were categorised as Veg*n vs Restricted-omnivore vs Omnivore, and completed personality questionnaires at the domain and aspect levels of the Big Five. In Study 2, participants (N = 562) completed both categorical and continuous measures of veg*nism, along with personality questionnaires at the domain, aspect, and facet levels. Across both studies, we found that people who scored higher on traits within the openness/intellect and agreeableness domains most consistently reported higher levels of veg*nism. Patterns in the data also suggested that the relation between personality and veg*nism might depend on the way veg*nism is measured. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[41]   Personality Traits and Eating Habits in a Large Sample of Estonians [J].
Mottus, Rene ;
Realo, Anu ;
Allik, Jueri ;
Deary, Ian J. ;
Esko, Tonu ;
Metspalu, Andres .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 31 (06) :806-814
[42]   The Associations Between Personality, Diet and Body Mass Index in Older People [J].
Mottus, Rene ;
McNeill, Geraldine ;
Jia, Xueli ;
Craig, Leone C. A. ;
Starr, John M. ;
Deary, Ian J. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 32 (04) :353-360
[43]   Too humanlike to increase my appetite: Disposition to anthropomorphize animals relates to decreased meat consumption through empathic concern [J].
Niemyjska, Aleksandra ;
Cantarero, Katarzyna ;
Byrka, Katarzyna ;
Bilewicz, Michal .
APPETITE, 2018, 127 :21-27
[44]   Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes [J].
Ozer, DJ ;
Benet-Martínez, V .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 57 :401-421
[45]   Personality and eating habits revisited: Associations between the big five, food choices, and Body Mass Index in a representative Australian sample [J].
Pfeiler, Tamara M. ;
Egloff, Boris .
APPETITE, 2020, 149
[46]   Examining the "Veggie" personality: Results from a representative German sample [J].
Pfeiler, Tamara M. ;
Egloff, Boris .
APPETITE, 2018, 120 :246-255
[47]   Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns [J].
Piazza, Jared ;
Ruby, Matthew B. ;
Loughnan, Steve ;
Luong, Mischel ;
Kulik, Juliana ;
Watkins, Hanne M. ;
Seigerman, Mirra .
APPETITE, 2015, 91 :114-128
[48]  
R Development Core Team R., 2018, R LANG ENV STAT COMP, DOI [10.1007/978-540-74686-7, DOI 10.1007/978-540-74686-7]
[49]  
Revelle W., 2021, psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research
[50]   The Power of Personality The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes [J].
Roberts, Brent W. ;
Kuncel, Nathan R. ;
Shiner, Rebecca ;
Caspi, Avshalom ;
Goldberg, Lewis R. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (04) :313-345