Public interest in unexpected genomic findings: a survey study identifying aspects of sequencing attitudes that influence preferences

被引:3
作者
Etchegary, Holly [1 ]
Pullman, Daryl [2 ]
Simmonds, Charlene [3 ]
Rahman, Proton [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ, Fac Med, Craig L Dobbin Ctr Genet, 300 Price Phillip Pkwy,Rm 4M210, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
[2] Mem Univ, Fac Med, Craig L Dobbin Ctr Genet, 300 Price Phillip Pkwy,Rm 4M211, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
[3] Mem Univ, Fac Med, Craig L Dobbin Ctr Genet, Hlth Res Unit, 300 Price Phillip Pkwy,4M137, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
[4] Mem Univ, Eastern Reg Hlth Author, 300 Price Phillip Pkwy,Rm 4M205A, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
[5] Craig L Dobbin Ctr Genet, 300 Price Phillip Pkwy,Rm 4M205A, St John, NF A1B 3V6, Canada
关键词
Genomics; Genome sequencing; Incidental findings; Public attitudes; Survey; WHOLE-GENOME; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; SECONDARY FINDINGS; CLINICAL EXOME; RECOMMENDATIONS; VIEWS; PERSPECTIVES; STATEMENT; GENETICS; COLLEGE;
D O I
10.1007/s12687-022-00577-0
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
We describe public preferences for unexpected genomic findings and explore predictors of preferences using an online survey in an Eastern Canadian province. Items measuring attitudes toward features of unexpected findings and genomic sequencing concerns were entered in logistic regression models predicting interest in unexpected findings. Very high levels of interest were observed in unexpected findings for treatable disorders and carrier results, with lesser interest in unexpected findings for non-treatable disorders and unclassified variants. Respondents who endorsed items measuring features of patient control and choice over their genomic data and testing options were 3-5 times more likely to be very interested in receiving unexpected findings. Respondents with high genomic sequencing concerns were less interested in the return of any unexpected result. Self-reported history of a genetic condition was significantly related to interest in receiving most categories of unexpected genomic information, while prior use of direct-to-consumer testing was significantly related only to interest in the return of unexpected genomic findings for disorders not currently treatable. Findings highlight the need for specific elements of information and transparency regarding the return of unexpected findings and can inform the development of patient-centered materials and return of results policies.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 245
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Abhyankar S., 2019, BMJ PARTNERSHIP PRAC
[2]  
[Anonymous], In-Canada Protection Services
[3]   Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a time [J].
Berg, Jonathan S. ;
Khoury, Muin J. ;
Evans, James P. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (06) :499-504
[4]  
Biesecker LG, 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, V371, P1170, DOI [10.1056/NEJMra1312543, 10.1056/NEJMc1408914]
[5]   Cancer patients' intentions towards receiving unsolicited genetic information obtained using next-generation sequencing [J].
Bijlsma, Rhode M. ;
Wessels, Hester ;
Wouters, Roel H. P. ;
May, Anne M. ;
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. ;
Voest, Emile E. ;
Bredenoord, Annelien L. .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2018, 17 (02) :309-316
[6]   Responsibility, identity, and genomic sequencing: A comparison of published recommendations and patient perspectives on accepting or declining incidental findings [J].
Boardman, Felicity ;
Hale, Rachel .
MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06) :1079-1096
[7]   The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists [J].
Boycott, Kym ;
Hartley, Taila ;
Adam, Shelin ;
Bernier, Francois ;
Chong, Karen ;
Fernandez, Bridget A. ;
Friedman, Jan M. ;
Geraghty, Michael T. ;
Hume, Stacey ;
Knoppers, Bartha M. ;
Laberge, Anne-Marie ;
Majewski, Jacek ;
Mendoza-Londono, Roberto ;
Meyn, M. Stephen ;
Michaud, Jacques L. ;
Nelson, Tanya N. ;
Richer, Julie ;
Sadikovic, Bekim ;
Skidmore, David L. ;
Stockley, Tracy ;
Taylor, Sherry ;
van Karnebeek, Clara ;
Zawati, Ma'n H. ;
Lauzon, Julie ;
Armour, Christine M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2015, 52 (07) :431-437
[8]   Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results [J].
Brothers, Kyle B. ;
East, Kelly M. ;
Kelley, Whitley V. ;
Wright, M. Frances ;
Westbrook, Matthew J. ;
Rich, Carla A. ;
Bowling, Kevin M. ;
Lose, Edward J. ;
Bebin, E. Martina ;
Simmons, Shirley ;
Myers, John A. ;
Barsh, Greg ;
Myers, Richard M. ;
Cooper, Greg M. ;
Pulley, Jill M. ;
Rothstein, Mark A. ;
Clayton, Ellen Wright .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 19 (03) :337-344
[9]   Sample Size Guidelines for Logistic Regression from Observational Studies with Large Population: Emphasis on the Accuracy Between Statistics and Parameters Based on Real Life Clinical Data [J].
Bujang, Mohamad Adam ;
Sa'at, Nadiah ;
Sidik, Tg Mohd Ikhwan Tg Abu Bakar ;
Joo, Lim Chien .
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 25 (04) :122-130
[10]   Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! [J].
Burke, Wylie ;
Antommaria, Armand H. Matheny ;
Bennett, Robin ;
Botkin, Jeffrey ;
Clayton, Ellen Wright ;
Henderson, Gail E. ;
Holm, Ingrid A. ;
Jarvik, Gail P. ;
Khoury, Muin J. ;
Knoppers, Bartha Maria ;
Press, Nancy A. ;
Ross, Lainie Friedman ;
Rothstein, Mark A. ;
Saal, Howard ;
Uhlmann, Wendy R. ;
Wilfond, Benjamin ;
Wolf, Susan M. ;
Zimmern, Ron .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (11) :854-859