Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis

被引:288
作者
Wu, C. L. [1 ,2 ]
Chau, K. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Changjiang Water Resources Commiss, Changjiang Inst Survey Planning Design & Res, Wuhan 430010, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Prediction; Rainfall and runoff; Artificial neural network; Modular model; Singular spectrum analysis; PREDICTION; RIVER; PERFORMANCE; TREES; ANN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.017
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Accurately modeling rainfall-runoff (R-R) transform remains a challenging task despite that a wide range of modeling techniques, either knowledge-driven or data-driven, have been developed in the past several decades. Amongst data-driven models, artificial neural network (ANN)-based R-R models have received great attentions in hydrology community owing to their capability to reproduce the highly nonlinear nature of the relationship between hydrological variables. However, a lagged prediction effect often appears in the ANN modeling process. This paper attempts to eliminate the lag effect from two aspects: modular artificial neural network (MANN) and data preprocessing by singular spectrum analysis (SSA). Two watersheds from China are explored with daily collected data. Results show that MANN does not exhibit significant advantages over ANN. However, it is demonstrated that SSA can considerably improve the performance of prediction model and eliminate the lag effect. Moreover, ANN or MANN with antecedent runoff only as model input is also developed and compared with the ANN (or MANN) R-R model. At all three prediction horizons, the latter outperforms the former regardless of being coupled with/without SSA. It is recommended from the present study that the ANN R-R model coupled with SSA is more promisings. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 409
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Managing uncertainty in hydrological models using complementary models [J].
Abebe, AJ ;
Price, RK .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2003, 48 (05) :679-692
[2]  
Abrahart R.J., 1999, Journal of Hydroinformatics, V1, P103, DOI DOI 10.2166/HYDRO.1999.0009
[3]   Investigating the role of saliency analysis with a neural network rainfall-runoff model [J].
Abrahart, RJ ;
See, L ;
Kneale, PE .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2001, 27 (08) :921-928
[4]   Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models [J].
Anctil, F ;
Perrin, C ;
Andréassian, V .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (04) :357-368
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Applied Regression Analysis
[6]  
[Anonymous], Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms
[7]   Application of an ensemble technique based on singular spectrum analysis to daily rainfall forecasting [J].
Baratta, D ;
Cicioni, G ;
Masulli, F ;
Studer, L .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2003, 16 (3-4) :375-387
[8]   Performance of neural networks in daily streamflow forecasting [J].
Birikundavyi, S ;
Labib, R ;
Trung, HT ;
Rousselle, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2002, 7 (05) :392-398
[9]   River flood forecasting with a neural network model [J].
Campolo, M ;
Andreussi, P ;
Soldati, A .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (04) :1191-1197
[10]   Baseflow separation techniques for modular artificial neural network modelling in flow forecasting [J].
Corzo, Gerald ;
Solomatine, Dimitri .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2007, 52 (03) :491-507