Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT

被引:28
作者
Jones, Stephen [1 ]
Williams, Matthew
机构
[1] Illawarra Canc Care Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
关键词
IMRT; DAO; DMPO; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2007.04.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Direct Machine Parameter Optimization (DMPO) is a leaf segmentation program released as an optional item of the Pinnacle planning system (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Milpitas, CA); it is based on the principles of direct aperture optimization where the size, shape, and weight of individual segments are optimized to produce an intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) plan. In this study, we compare DMPO to the traditional method of IMRT planning, in which intensity maps are optimized prior to conversion into deliverable multileaf collimator (MLC) apertures, and we determine if there was any dosimetric improvement, treatment efficiency gain, or planning advantage provided by the use of DMPO. Eleven head-and-neck patients treated with IMRT had treatment plans generated using each optimization method. For each patient, the same planning parameters were used for each optimization method. All calculations were performed using Pinnacle version 7.6c software and treatments were delivered using a step-and-shoot IMRT method on a Varian 2100EX linear accelerator equipped with a 120-leaf Millennium MLC (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). Each plan was assessed based on the calculation time, a conformity index, the composite objective value used in the optimization, the number of segments, monitor units (MUs), and treatment time. The results showed DMPO to be superior to the traditional optimization method in all areas. Considerable advantages were observed in the dosimetric quality of DMPO plans, which also required 32% less time to calculate, 42% fewer MUs, and 35% fewer segments than the conventional optimization method. These reductions translated directly into a 29% decrease in treatment times. While considerable gains were observed in planning and treatment efficiency, they were specific to our institution, and the impact of direct aperture optimization on plan quality and workflow will be dependent on the planning parameters, planning system, and linear accelerators used by a particular institution. (c) 2008 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Bedford James L, 2004, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V5, P1, DOI 10.1120/jacmp.2020.25271
  • [2] Constrained segment shapes in direct-aperture optimization for step-and-shoot IMRT
    Bedford, JL
    Webb, S
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (04) : 944 - 958
  • [3] IMRT: a review and preview
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (13) : R363 - R379
  • [4] Fast, multiple optimizations of quadratic dose objective functions in IMRT
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Storchi, Pascal R. M.
    Keijzer, Marleen
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (14) : 3569 - 3579
  • [5] Intensity modulation delivery techniques: "Step & shoot" MLC auto-sequence versus the use of a modulator
    Chang, SX
    Cullip, TJ
    Deschesne, KM
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (05) : 948 - 959
  • [6] An anatomy-based beam segmentation tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and its application to head-and-neck cancer
    De Gersem, W
    Claus, F
    De Wagter, C
    De Neve, W
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (03): : 849 - 859
  • [7] Conformity index:: A review
    Feuvret, L
    Noël, G
    Mazeron, JJ
    Bey, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (02): : 333 - 342
  • [8] Comparative analysis of intensity modulation inverse planning modules of three commercial treatment planning systems applied to head and neck tumour model
    Fogliata, A
    Bolsi, A
    Cozzi, L
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 66 (01) : 29 - 40
  • [9] Loss of biological effect in prolonged fraction delivery
    Fowler, JF
    Welsh, JS
    Howard, SP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (01): : 242 - 249
  • [10] Intensity modulation with the "step and shoot" technique using a commercial MLC:: A planning study
    Keller-Reichenbecher, MA
    Bortfeld, T
    Levegrün, S
    Stein, J
    Preiser, K
    Schlegel, W
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (05): : 1315 - 1324