Open innovation: on the influence of internal and external collaboration on degree of newness

被引:34
作者
Lassen, Astrid Heidemann [1 ]
Laugen, Bjorge Timenes [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Ind Prod, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Sub Sea Serv, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Internal and external collaboration; Open innovation; Incremental and radical innovation; Survey; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; JOINT VENTURES; TECHNOLOGY; FIRM; PERFORMANCE; NETWORKS; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1108/BPMJ-10-2016-0212
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to test the effect of internal and external collaboration on the degree of newness (incremental/radical) in innovation projects. This adds to the understanding of the particular patterns of open innovation (OI) and what characterizes the innovation emerging through this approach. Design/methodology/approach - Tests are performed on the effect of internal and external collaboration on the degree of newness (incremental/radical) in innovation projects. This adds to the understanding of the particular patterns of OI and what characterizes the innovation emerging through this approach. The empirical analysis is based on a data set including responses from 512 Danish engineers. Findings - The results show that external collaboration has significantly different effects on the degree of newness depending on the type of external partners involved, and they also show that radical innovation output is positively related to involving the R&D department (internal) and universities (external involvement) and negatively related to involving suppliers. Originality/value - The results provide a more detailed understanding of how different OI patterns affect the development of incremental vs radical innovation in existing organizations. In particular, three findings add new insights into how OI affects innovation to reach the highest degree of newness: high importance of collaboration with external partners with distinct interests and skills; low reliance on existing customers and suppliers for the development of radical innovation; and narrow and focused internal involvement rather than broad internal involvement.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1143
页数:15
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Abetti P.A., 2000, Creativity and Innovation Management, V9, P208
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[4]  
[Anonymous], NETWORKS TECHNOLOGIC
[5]   Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms [J].
Argote, L ;
Ingram, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (01) :150-169
[6]  
Baden-Fuller C., 1996, Strategic Innovation
[7]   Cooperative R&D and firm performance [J].
Belderbos, R ;
Carree, M ;
Lokshin, B .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (10) :1477-1492
[8]  
BERG SV, 1982, JOINT STRATEGIES COR
[9]   Managing innovation beyond the steady state [J].
Bessant, J ;
Lamming, R ;
Noke, H ;
Phillips, W .
TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (12) :1366-1376
[10]  
Bessant J., 2003, High Involvement Innovation:Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage Through Continuous Change