Improving attitudes toward prostate examinations by loss-framed appeals

被引:23
作者
Cherubini, P
Rumiati, R
Rossi, D
Nigro, F
Calabró, A
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento Psicol, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Trent, Cognit Sci Lab, Trento, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Urol Clin, Padua, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02144.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
One of the main causes of late diagnoses in prostate cancer is the aversive attitude toward prostate examinations. In this study, we analyze the efficacy of an informative pamphlet in changing that attitude. A randomized sample of north Italian men was given different versions of an informative pamphlet, obtained by systematically manipulating the message framing and emotional vividness. After reading the pamphlet, each participant completed an attitude questionnaire. Levels of anxiety and self-reported health status were measured using the STAI-X2 and the SF-36 questionnaires. Results show that loss-framed messages (i.e., messages highlighting the negative consequences of not doing the examinations) had a significant positive effect on attitudes toward the prostate screening, but the effect was rather small.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 744
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   Applying persuasion strategies to alter HIV-relevant thoughts and behavior [J].
Devos-Comby, L ;
Salovey, P .
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 6 (03) :287-304
[12]   THE EFFECT OF FRAMING ON CHOICE - INTERACTIONS WITH RISK-TAKING PROPENSITY, COGNITIVE-STYLE, AND SEX [J].
FAGLEY, NS ;
MILLER, PM .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1990, 16 (03) :496-510
[13]   Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life? [J].
Fagley, NS ;
Miller, PM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 71 (03) :355-373
[14]   THE EFFECTS OF DECISION FRAMING ON CHOICE OF RISKY VS CERTAIN OPTIONS [J].
FAGLEY, NS ;
MILLER, PM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1987, 39 (02) :264-277
[15]   REASONS FOR FRAMING EFFECTS [J].
FRISCH, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1993, 54 (03) :399-429
[16]  
HERRNSTEIN RJ, 1990, AM PSYCHOL, V45, P356
[17]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[18]   CONTEXT FRAMING TO ENHANCE HIV-ANTIBODY-TESTING MESSAGES TARGETED TO AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN [J].
KALICHMAN, SC ;
COLEY, B .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 14 (03) :247-254
[19]   The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis [J].
Kuhberger, A .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1998, 75 (01) :23-55
[20]   The effects of framing, reflection, probability, and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks [J].
Kühberger, A ;
Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M ;
Perner, J .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1999, 78 (03) :204-231