The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR

被引:163
作者
Verrecht, Bart [1 ]
Maere, Thomas [2 ]
Nopens, Ingmar [2 ]
Brepols, Christoph [3 ]
Judd, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Ctr Water Sci, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Univ Ghent, BIOMATH, Dept Appl Math Biometr & Proc Control, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Erftverband, D-50126 Bergheim Erft, Germany
关键词
Membrane bioreactor; Cost sensitivity; Life cycle; Biokinetics; Aeration; SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; OXYGEN-TRANSFER; DESIGN; AERATION; SLUDGE; FLUX;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.054
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A cost sensitivity analysis was carried out for a full-scale hollow fibre membrane bioreactor to quantify the effect of design choices and operational parameters on cost. Different options were subjected to a long term dynamic influent profile and evaluated using ASM1 for effluent quality, aeration requirements and sludge production. The results were used to calculate a net present value (NPV), incorporating both capital expenditure (capex), based on costs obtained from equipment manufacturers and full-scale plants, and operating expenditure (opex), accounting for energy demand, sludge production and chemical cleaning costs. Results show that the amount of contingency built in to cope with changes in feedwater flow has a large impact on NPV. Deviation from a constant daily flow increases NPV as mean plant utilisation decreases. Conversely, adding a buffer tank reduces NPV, since less membrane surface is required when average plant utilisation increases. Membrane cost and lifetime is decisive in determining NPV: an increased membrane replacement interval from 5 to 10 years reduces NPV by 19%. Operation at higher SRT increases the NPV, since the reduced costs for sludge treatment are offset by correspondingly higher aeration costs at higher MLSS levels, though the analysis is very sensitive to sludge treatment costs. A higher sustainable flux demands greater membrane aeration, but the subsequent opex increase is offset by the reduced membrane area and the corresponding lower capex. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5274 / 5283
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PRINCIPLES APPL MEMB
  • [2] Strategies for chemical cleaning in large scale membrane bioreactors
    Brepols, C.
    Drensla, K.
    Janot, A.
    Trimborn, M.
    Engelhardt, N.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 57 (03) : 457 - 463
  • [3] BREPOLS C, 2010, COMMUNICATION
  • [4] BREPOLS C, 2010, MBR PRACTICE REPORT
  • [5] BREPOLS C, 2009, MBR NETW WORKSH SAL
  • [6] Considerations on the design and financial feasibility of full-scale membrane bioreactors for municipal applications
    Brepols, Ch.
    Schaefer, H.
    Engelhardt, N.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (10) : 2461 - 2468
  • [7] Copp J.B., 2002, The COST simulation benchmark-Description and simulator manual
  • [8] Comparsion of membrane options for water reuse and reclamation
    Côté, P
    Masini, M
    Mourato, D
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2004, 167 (1-3) : 1 - 11
  • [9] De Wilde W., 2007, 4 INT WAT ASS C MEMB
  • [10] De Wilde W., 2007, Towards standardisation of MBR technology? AMEDEUS (accelerate membrane developmentfor urban sewagepurification)