Physics-informed neural networks for hydraulic transient analysis in pipeline systems

被引:28
作者
Ye, Jiawei [1 ]
Do, Nhu Cuong [1 ]
Zeng, Wei [1 ]
Lambert, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Civil Environm & Min Engn, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Hydraulic transient; Physics-informed neural network; Artificial intelligence; Pipeline system; Partial differential equations; WALL VISCOELASTICITY; PRESSURE; FRICTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2022.118828
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In water pipeline systems, monitoring and predicting hydraulic transient events are important to ensure the proper operation of pressure control devices (e.g., pressure reducing valves) and prevent potential damages to the network infrastructure. Simulating transient pressures using traditional numerical methods, however, require a complete model with known boundary and initial conditions, which is rarely able to obtain in a real system. This paper proposes a new physics-based and data-driven method for targeted transient pressure reconstruction without the need of having a complete pipe system model. The new method formulates a physics-informed neural network (PINN) by incorporating both measured data and physical laws of the transient flow in the training process. This enables the PINN to learn and explore hidden information of the hydraulic transient (e.g., boundary conditions and wave damping characteristics) that is embedded in the measured data. The trained PINN can then be used to predict transient pressures at any location of the pipeline. Results from two numerical and one experimental case studies showed a high accuracy of the pressure reconstruction using the proposed approach. In addition, a series of sensitivity analyses have been conducted to determine the optimal hyperparameters in the PINN and to understand the effects of the sensor configuration on the model performance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Adami S., 2021, ARXIV
[2]   Simulation of transient flow in pipeline systems due to load rejection and load acceptance by hydroelectric power plants [J].
Afshar, M. H. ;
Rohani, M. ;
Taheri, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 52 (01) :103-115
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Smart Water, V1, DOI 10.1186/s40713-016-0004-4
[4]  
Badawy N. A.M., 2020, Journal of Water and Land Development, V2020, P47, DOI [10.24425/jwld.2020.135031, DOI 10.24425/JWLD.2020.135031, 10.24425/JWLD.2020.135031]
[5]  
Baydin AG, 2018, J MACH LEARN RES, V18
[6]   Merging Fluid Transient Waves and Artificial Neural Networks for Burst Detection and Identification in Pipelines [J].
Bohorquez, Jessica ;
Simpson, Angus R. ;
Lambert, Martin F. ;
Alexander, Bradley .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 147 (01)
[7]   Hydraulic transient guidelines for protecting water distribution systems [J].
Boulos, PF ;
Karney, BW ;
Wood, DJ ;
Lingireddy, S .
JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2005, 97 (05) :111-124
[8]   Velocity profiles and unsteady pipe friction in transient flow [J].
Brunone, B ;
Karney, BW ;
Mecarelli, M ;
Ferrante, M .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2000, 126 (04) :236-244
[9]  
BUDNY DD, 1991, J FLUID ENG-T ASME, V113, P424, DOI 10.1115/1.2909513
[10]   A LIMITED MEMORY ALGORITHM FOR BOUND CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION [J].
BYRD, RH ;
LU, PH ;
NOCEDAL, J ;
ZHU, CY .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 1995, 16 (05) :1190-1208