Swine models for translational oncological research: an evolving landscape and regulatory considerations

被引:9
作者
Boettcher, Adeline N. [1 ]
Schachtschneider, Kyle M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Schook, Lawrence B. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Tuggle, Christopher K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, 2255 Kildee Hall,806 Stange Rd, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Natl Ctr Supercomp Applicat, Urbana, IL USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Biochem & Mol Genet, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Illinois, Dept Anim Sci, Champaign, IL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SEVERE COMBINED IMMUNODEFICIENCY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; KNOCKOUT PIGS; ANIMAL-MODEL; PORCINE; CANCER; TUMORIGENESIS; GENERATION; XENOGRAFT; PANCREAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00335-021-09907-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Swine biomedical models have been gaining in popularity over the last decade, particularly for applications in oncology research. Swine models for cancer research include pigs that have severe combined immunodeficiency for xenotransplantation studies, genetically modified swine models which are capable of developing tumors in vivo, as well as normal immunocompetent pigs. In recent years, there has been a low success rate for the approval of new oncological therapeutics in clinical trials. The two leading reasons for these failures are either due to toxicity and safety issues or lack of efficacy. As all therapeutics must be tested within animal models prior to clinical testing, there are opportunities to expand the ability to assess efficacy and toxicity profiles within the preclinical testing phases of new therapeutics. Most preclinical in vivo testing is performed in mice, canines, and non-human primates. However, swine models are an alternative large animal model for cancer research with similarity to human size, genetics, and physiology. Additionally, tumorigenesis pathways are similar between human and pigs in that similar driver mutations are required for transformation. Due to their larger size, the development of orthotopic tumors is easier than in smaller rodent models; additionally, porcine models can be harnessed for testing of new interventional devices and radiological/surgical approaches as well. Taken together, swine are a feasible option for preclinical therapeutic and device testing. The goals of this resource are to provide a broad overview on regulatory processes required for new therapeutics and devices for use in the clinic, cross-species differences in oncological therapeutic responses, as well as to provide an overview of swine oncology models that have been developed that could be used for preclinical testing to fulfill regulatory requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 240
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Genetic induction of tumorigenesis in Swine [J].
Adam, S. J. ;
Rund, L. A. ;
Kuzmuk, K. N. ;
Zachary, J. F. ;
Schook, L. B. ;
Counter, C. M. .
ONCOGENE, 2007, 26 (07) :1038-1045
[2]   Development of transplantable B-cell lymphomas in the MHC-defined miniature swine model [J].
Andrews, Alec R. ;
Wang, Zhaohui ;
Wilkinson, Robert A. ;
Fishman, Jay A. ;
Sachs, David H. ;
Navarro-Alvarez, Nalu ;
Huang, Christene A. .
CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 19 (01)
[3]   Human Xenografts Are Not Rejected in a Naturally Occurring Immunodeficient Porcine Line: A Human Tumor Model in Pigs [J].
Basel, Matthew T. ;
Balivada, Sivasai ;
Beck, Amanda P. ;
Kerrigan, Maureen A. ;
Pyle, Marla M. ;
Dekkers, Jack C. M. ;
Wyatt, Carol R. ;
Rowland, Robert R. R. ;
Anderson, David E. ;
Bossmann, Stefan H. ;
Troyer, Deryl L. .
BIORESEARCH OPEN ACCESS, 2012, 1 (02) :63-68
[4]   Induction and characterization of pancreatic cancer in a transgenic pig model [J].
Boas, F. Edward ;
Nurili, Fuad ;
Bendet, Achiude ;
Cheleuitte-Nieves, Christopher ;
Basturk, Olca ;
Askan, Gokce ;
Michel, Adam O. ;
Monette, Sebastien ;
Ziv, Etay ;
Sofocleous, Constantinos T. ;
Maxwell, Aaron W. P. ;
Schook, Lawrence B. ;
Solomon, Stephen B. ;
Kelsen, David P. ;
Scherz, Avigdor ;
Yarmohammadi, Hooman .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09)
[5]   CD3ε+ Cells in Pigs With Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Due to Defects in ARTEMIS [J].
Boettcher, Adeline N. ;
Cino-Ozuna, A. Giselle ;
Solanki, Yash ;
Wiarda, Jayne E. ;
Putz, Ellie ;
Owens, Jeana L. ;
Crane, Sara A. ;
Ahrens, Amanda P. ;
Loving, Crystal L. ;
Cunnick, Joan. E. ;
Rowland, Raymond R. R. ;
Charley, Sara E. ;
Dekkers, Jack C. M. ;
Tuggle, Christopher K. .
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 11
[6]   Novel Engraftment and T Cell Differentiation of Human Hematopoietic Cells in ART-/- IL2RG-/Y SCID Pigs [J].
Boettcher, Adeline N. ;
Li, Yunsheng ;
Ahrens, Amanda P. ;
Kiupel, Matti ;
Byrne, Kristen A. ;
Loving, Crystal L. ;
Cino-Ozuna, A. Giselle ;
Wiarda, Jayne E. ;
Adur, Malavika ;
Schultz, Blythe ;
Swanson, Jack J. ;
Snella, Elizabeth M. ;
Ho, Chak-Sum ;
Charley, Sara E. ;
Kiefer, Zoe E. ;
Cunnick, Joan E. ;
Putz, Ellie J. ;
Dell'Anna, Giuseppe ;
Jens, Jackie ;
Sathe, Swanand ;
Goldman, Frederick ;
Westin, Erik R. ;
Dekkers, Jack C. M. ;
Ross, Jason W. ;
Tuggle, Christopher K. .
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 11
[7]   Human Ovarian Cancer Tumor Formation in Severe Combined Immunodeficient (SCID) Pigs [J].
Boettcher, Adeline N. ;
Kiupel, Matti ;
Adur, Malavika K. ;
Cocco, Emiliano ;
Santin, Alessandro D. ;
Bellone, Stefania ;
Charley, Sara E. ;
Blanco-Fernandez, Barbara ;
Risinger, John, I ;
Ross, Jason W. ;
Tuggle, Christopher K. ;
Shapiro, Erik M. .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
[8]   Development of Severe Combined Immunodeficient (SCID) Pig Models for Translational Cancer Modeling: Future Insights on How Humanized SCID Pigs Can Improve Preclinical Cancer Research [J].
Boettcher, Adeline N. ;
Loving, Crystal L. ;
Cunnick, Joan E. ;
Tuggle, Christopher K. .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8
[9]   Comparison of xenobiotic-metabolising human, porcine, rodent, and piscine cytochrome P450 [J].
Burkina, Viktoriia ;
Rasmussen, Martin Kroyer ;
Pilipenko, Nadezhda ;
Zamaratskaia, Galia .
TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 375 :10-27
[10]   The Value of Outbred Rodent Models in Cancer Research [J].
Chatzistamou, Ioulia ;
Farmaki, Elena ;
Kaza, Vimala ;
Kiaris, Hippokratis .
TRENDS IN CANCER, 2018, 4 (07) :468-471