Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic ileocaecal resection versus infliximab treatment of terminal ileitis in Crohn's disease: the LIR!C Trial

Objective Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic ileocaecal resection compared with infliximab in patients with ileocaecal Crohn's disease failing conventional therapy. Design A multicentre randomised controlled trial was performed in 29 centres in The Netherlands and the UK. Adult patients with Crohn's disease of the terminal ileum who failed >3 months of conventional immunomodulators or steroids without signs of critical strictures were randomised to laparoscopic ileocaecal resection or infliximab. Outcome measures included quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on the EuroQol (EQ) 5D-3L Questionnaire and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ). Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Missing cost and effect data were imputed using multiple imputation. Cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were estimated to show uncertainty. Results In total, 143 patients were randomised. Mean Crohn's disease total direct healthcare costs per patient at 1 year were lower in the resection group compared with the infliximab group (mean difference (sic)-8931; 95% CI (sic)-12 087 to (sic)-5097). Total societal costs in the resection group were lower than in the infliximab group, however not statistically significant (mean difference (sic)-5729, 95% CI (sic)-10 606 to (sic)172). The probability of resection being cost-effective compared with infliximab was 0.96 at a willingness to pay (WTP) of (sic)0 per QALY gained and per point improvement in IBDQ Score. This probability increased to 0.98 at a WTP of (sic)20 000/QALY gained and 0.99 at a WTP of (sic)500/point of improvement in IBDQ Score. Conclusion Laparoscopic ileocaecal resection is a cost-effective treatment option compared with infliximab.