Factors influencing daily quality assurance measurements of magnetic resonance imaging scanners

被引:3
|
作者
Owusu, Nana [1 ,2 ]
Magnotta, Vincent A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiol, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychiat, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
[4] 169 Newton Rd, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Signal-to-noise ratio; Quality assurance; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-021-00638-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging is commonly used in hospitals and clinics to aid medical diagnoses. Scanner performance should be assessed regularly, including daily, weekly, and yearly evaluations to ensure high-quality and artifact-free images. Of these assessments, the daily quality assurance monitors the image quality of the scanner using a manufacturer-provided protocol. In this study, we sought to determine the factors that introduced variability in daily quality assurance data. A phantom was scanned using a head coil in two schemes: with varied phantom placement daily, and with a single phantom placement, and evaluated over approximately 1 month. Minor placement and localization changes accounted for approximately 50% of the variability in the signal-to-noise ratios observed in these measures, driven by changes in the measured signal, while the noise remained constant. The changes in the signal-to-noise ratios were small over the 2-month study period.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 401
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of a temperature-controlled phantom for magnetic resonance quality assurance of diffusion, dynamic, and relaxometry measurements
    Jerome, Neil P.
    Papoutsaki, Marianthi-Vasiliki
    Orton, Matthew R.
    Parkes, Harold G.
    Winfield, Jessica M.
    Boss, Michael A.
    Leach, Martin O.
    deSouza, Nandita M.
    Collins, David J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 2998 - 3007
  • [32] Quality Assurance Multicenter Comparison of Different MR Scanners for Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
    Belli, Giacomo
    Busoni, Simone
    Ciccarone, Antonio
    Coniglio, Angela
    Esposito, Marco
    Giannelli, Marco
    Mazzoni, Lorenzo N.
    Nocetti, Luca
    Sghedoni, Roberto
    Tarducci, Roberto
    Zatelli, Giovanna
    Anoja, Rosa A.
    Belmonte, Gina
    Bertolino, Nicola
    Betti, Margherita
    Biagini, Cristiano
    Ciarmatori, Alberto
    Cretti, Fabiola
    Fabbri, Emma
    Fedeli, Luca
    Filice, Silvano
    Fulcheri, Christian P. L.
    Gasperi, Chiara
    Mangili, Paola A.
    Mazzocchi, Silvia
    Meliado, Gabriele
    Morzenti, Sabrina
    Noferini, Linhsia
    Oberhofer, Nadia
    Orsingher, Laura
    Paruccini, Nicoletta
    Princigalli, Goffredo
    Quattrocchi, Mariagrazia
    Rinaldi, Adele
    Scelfo, Danilo
    Freixas, Gloria Vilches
    Tenori, Leonardo
    Zucca, Ileana
    Luchinat, Claudio
    Gori, Cesare
    Gobbi, Gianni
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 43 (01) : 213 - 219
  • [33] A cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging study of factors influencing growth plate closure in adolescents and young adults
    Kvist, Ola
    Luiza Dallora, Ana
    Nilsson, Ola
    Anderberg, Peter
    Sanmartin Berglund, Johan
    Flodmark, Carl-Erik
    Diaz, Sandra
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2021, 110 (04) : 1249 - 1256
  • [34] Magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of the myodural bridge complex and its influencing factors
    Xiao Feng
    Cong Liu
    Dong-Mei Hu
    Jian-Fei Zhang
    Nan Zheng
    Yan-Yan Chi
    Sheng-Bo Yu
    Hong-Jin Sui
    Qiang Xu
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2024, 46 : 125 - 135
  • [35] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain Using Compressed Sensing – Quality Assessment in Daily Clinical Routine
    Sebastian Mönch
    Nico Sollmann
    Andreas Hock
    Claus Zimmer
    Jan S. Kirschke
    Dennis M. Hedderich
    Clinical Neuroradiology, 2020, 30 : 279 - 286
  • [36] Application of magnetic resonance imaging to the horse:: influence of external factors on image quality at low field.
    Tapprest, J
    Audigié, F
    Radier, C
    Didierlaurent, D
    Mathieu, D
    Denoix, JM
    REVUE DE MEDECINE VETERINAIRE, 2003, 154 (8-9) : 515 - 520
  • [37] Women are more strongly affected by dizziness in static magnetic fields of magnetic resonance imaging scanners
    Heinrich, Angela
    Szostek, Anne
    Meyer, Patric
    Reinhard, Iris
    Gilles, Maria
    Paslakis, Georgios
    Rauschenberg, Jaane
    Groebner, Jens
    Semmler, Wolfhard
    Deuschle, Michael
    Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas
    Flor, Herta
    Nees, Frauke
    NEUROREPORT, 2014, 25 (14) : 1081 - 1084
  • [38] Antral motility measurements by magnetic resonance imaging
    Marciani, L
    Young, P
    Wright, J
    Moore, R
    Coleman, N
    Gowland, PA
    Spiller, RC
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2001, 13 (05): : 511 - 518
  • [39] Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Safety and Imaging Quality
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Link, Michael J.
    Lane, John I.
    Watson, Robert E.
    McGee, Kiaran P.
    Bernstein, Matt A.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (06) : 965 - 971
  • [40] Image Quality of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator System Designed for the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Environment
    Schwitter, Juerg
    Gold, Michael R.
    Al Fagih, Ahmed
    Lee, Sung
    Peterson, Michael
    Ciuffo, Allen
    Zhang, Yan
    Kristiansen, Nina
    Kanal, Emanuel
    Sommer, Torsten
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2016, 9 (05)