Current trends in robot assisted surgery: a survey of gynecologic oncologists

被引:12
作者
duPont, Nefertiti C. [1 ]
Chandrasekhar, Rameela [2 ]
Wilding, Gregory [2 ]
Guru, Khurshid A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Biostat, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[3] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
关键词
robot assisted surgery; gynecologic oncology; survey; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; LAPAROSCOPY; OUTCOMES; LYMPHADENECTOMY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.357
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To evaluate the perceptions of the importance and utility of robot assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology. Methods A 39 question web-based survey was sent to members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists. Results The survey response rate was 28%, with 277 surveys completed. Nearly 40% of respondents felt robotic surgical training was required as a part of their career goals, and 73% of respondents have performed a robotic hysterectomy. Among respondents, 39% felt that robotic surgery was as good as laparoscopic surgery but 23% thought robot assisted surgery should be the gold standard for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Conclusions Robot assisted surgery is gaining widespread acceptance and is perceived to be as good as laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of early stage endometrial and cervical cancers. Among respondents the greatest benefit of robot assisted surgery was its ease of use and perceived improvement in a patient's quality of life. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 472
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology [J].
Bandera, Christina A. ;
Magrina, Javier F. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 21 (01) :25-30
[2]   Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques [J].
Bell, Maria C. ;
Torgerson, Jenny ;
Seshadri-Kreaden, Usha ;
Suttle, Allison Wierda ;
Hunt, Sharon .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 111 (03) :407-411
[3]  
Boggess JF, 2007, J ROBOT SURG, V1, P31, DOI 10.1007/s11701-007-0011-4
[4]   A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy [J].
Boggess, John F. ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Cantrell, Leigh ;
Shafer, Aaron ;
Ridgway, Mildred ;
Skinner, Elizabeth N. ;
Fowler, Wesley C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (04) :357.e1-357.e7
[5]   Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A 3-year experience [J].
Cantrell, Leigh A. ;
Mendivil, Alberto ;
Gehrig, Paola A. ;
Boggess, John F. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :260-265
[6]   Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center [J].
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel ;
Adams, Sarah ;
Bhat, Suneel B. ;
Randall, Thomas C. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :224-228
[7]   A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or internet-based surveys [J].
Cook, C ;
Heath, F ;
Thompson, RL .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 60 (06) :821-836
[8]   A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy [J].
Estape, Ricardo ;
Lambrou, Nicholas ;
Diaz, Robert ;
Estape, Eric ;
Dunkin, Natalie ;
Rivera, Angel .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 113 (03) :357-361
[9]   Laparoscopic training and practice in gynecologic oncology among Society of Gynecologic Oncologists members and fellows-in-training [J].
Frumovitz, M ;
Ramirez, PT ;
Greer, M ;
Gregurich, MA ;
Wolf, J ;
Bodurka, DC ;
Levenback, C .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 94 (03) :746-753
[10]  
Guru KA, 2009, CAN J UROL, V16, P4736