Usability Evaluation of an Offline Electronic Data Capture App in a Prospective Multicenter Dementia Registry (digiDEM Bayern): Mixed Method Study

被引:7
作者
Reichold, Michael [1 ]
Hess, Miriam [1 ]
Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter [2 ]
Graessel, Elmar [3 ]
Prokosch, Hans-Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Dept Med Informat Biometr & Epidemiol, Wetterkreuz 15, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Technol Assessment & P, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Ctr Hlth Serv Res Med, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
dementia; usability; evaluation; mobile device; registry; electronic data collection; offline; mobile app; digital health; usability testing; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; EMPIRICAL-EVALUATION; USER ACCEPTANCE; SYSTEMS; COLLECTION; WORKFLOW; PREDICT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2196/31649
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital registries have been shown to provide an efficient way of gaining a better understanding of the clinical complexity and long-term progression of diseases. The paperless method of electronic data capture (EDC) during a patient interview saves both time and resources. In the prospective multicenter project "Digital Dementia Registry Bavaria (digiDEM Bayern)," interviews are also performed on site in rural areas with unreliable internet connectivity. It must be ensured that EDC can still be performed in such a context and that there is no need to fall back on paper-based questionnaires. In addition to a web-based data collection solution, the EDC system REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) offers the option to collect data offline via an app and to synchronize it afterward. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability of the REDCap app as an offline EDC option for a lay user group and to examine the necessary technology acceptance of using mobile devices for data collection. The feasibility of the app-based offline data collection in the digiDEM Bayern dementia registry project was then evaluated before going live. Methods: An exploratory mixed method design was employed in the form of an on-site usability test with the "Thinking Aloud" method combined with an online questionnaire including the System Usability Scale (SUS). The acceptance of mobile devices for data collection was surveyed based on five categories of the technology acceptance model. Results: Using the "Thinking Aloud" method, usability issues were identified and solutions were accordingly derived. Evaluation of the REDCap app resulted in a SUS score of 74, which represents "good" usability. After evaluating the technology acceptance questionnaire, it can be concluded that the lay user group is open to mobile devices as interview tools. Conclusions: The usability evaluation results show that a lay user group generally agree that data collecting partners in the digiDEM project can handle the REDCap app well. The usability evaluation provided statements about positive aspects and could also identify usability issues relating to the REDCap app. In addition, the current technology acceptance in the sample showed that heterogeneous groups of different ages with diverse experiences in handling mobile devices are also ready for the use of app-based EDC systems. Based on these results, it can be assumed that the offline use of an app-based EDC system on mobile devices is a viable solution for collecting data in a decentralized registry-based research project.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 98 条
[71]  
Ross J, 2015, AUSTRALASIAN C INFOR
[72]  
Saade Raafat George, 2006, Information Universe: Journal of Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, V3, P529
[73]   SAMPLE-SIZE IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH [J].
SANDELOWSKI, M .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1995, 18 (02) :179-183
[74]  
Sarodnick F., 2011, Methoden der Usability Evaluation: wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung, V2nd
[75]   Practical applications of usability theory to electronic data collection for clinical trials [J].
Schmier, JK ;
Kane, DW ;
Halpern, MT .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 26 (03) :376-385
[76]  
Schoonenboom J, 2017, KOLNER Z SOZIOL SOZ, V69, P107, DOI 10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
[77]   The influence of age in usability testing [J].
Sonderegger, Andreas ;
Schmutz, Sven ;
Sauer, Juergen .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2016, 52 :291-300
[78]  
Spencer L., 2004, Quality in qualitative evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence, V2nd
[79]   Medical Registry Data Collection Efficiency: A Crossover Study Comparing Web-Based Electronic Data Capture and a Standard Spreadsheet [J].
Staziaki, Pedro Vinicius ;
Kim, Phillip ;
Vadvala, Harshna V. ;
Ghoshhajra, Brian B. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (06)
[80]   A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies [J].
Sully, Ben G. O. ;
Julious, Steven A. ;
Nicholl, Jon .
TRIALS, 2013, 14