Reducing emissions of the fast growing Vietnamese coal sector: The chances offered by biomass co-firing

被引:27
作者
An Ha Truong [1 ,3 ]
Patrizio, Piera [2 ]
Leduc, Sylvain [2 ]
Kraxner, Florian [2 ]
Ha-Duong, Minh [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Hanoi, Clean Energy & Sustainable Dev Lab CleanED, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet St, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, ESM, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[3] Vietnam Acad Sci & Technol, Ctr Res & Technol Transfer, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet St, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Ctr Int Rech Environm & Dev, Campus Jardin Trop,45 Bis,Ave Belle Gabrielle, F-94736 Nogent Sur Marne, France
关键词
Co-firing; Emission reduction; Bioenergy; Rice residues; Greenhouse gas emissions; Spatial explicit exploration; POWER-PLANTS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.065
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Vietnam's Power Development Plan 7A authorized many new coal power plants projects, implying an increase of greenhouse gases emissions from 90 MtCO(2)eq/year today to 360 MtCO(2)eq/year in 2030. How could co-firing technology -that is the partial substitution of coal by biomass- contributes to mitigate that problem? In this study, we assess the costs and potentials of co-firing rice residues in present and planned coal power plants in Vietnam using a spatially explicit optimization model: BeWhere, adapted as recursive annual dynamic. We found that, the cost of CO2 emissions is the key parameter determining at what level the technology is used. A cost of CO2 emissions of 8 $/tCO(2) mobilizes the maximum technical potential of the rice straw and husk domestic resource, with an annual emission reduction of 28 MtCO(2)eq/year by 2030. At this level, biomass co-firing contributes to an 8% emission reduction in the coal power sector with the abatement cost of 137 Million USD. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1311
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   A review of biomass co-firing in North America [J].
Agbor, Ezinwa ;
Zhang, Xiaolei ;
Kumar, Amit .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 40 :930-943
[2]   Environmental performance assessment of retrofitting existing coal fired power plants to co-firing with biomass: carbon footprint and emergy approach [J].
Andric, I. ;
Jamali-Zghal, N. ;
Santarelli, M. ;
Lacarriere, B. ;
Le Corre, O. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 103 :13-27
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, BIOMASS POWER GENERA
[4]  
[Anonymous], ADJ 7 VIETN POW DEV
[5]  
[Anonymous], STAT HDB VIETN 2016
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, VIETN EL ANN REP 201
[7]  
Arvo L., 2013, DEV BIOMASS FUEL CHA
[8]   Forward-looking versus recursive-dynamic modeling in climate policy analysis: A comparison [J].
Babiker, Mustafa ;
Gurgel, Angelo ;
Paltsev, Sergey ;
Reilly, John .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2009, 26 (06) :1341-1354
[9]   Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants [J].
Basu, Prabir ;
Butler, James ;
Leon, Mathias A. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) :282-288
[10]  
Biomass I.R.E.N.A, 2013, COF TECHN BRIEF