Comparison of different stress-state dependent cohesive zone models applied to thin-walled structures

被引:15
|
作者
Scheider, Ingo [1 ]
Rajendran, M. [2 ]
Banerjee, Anuradha [2 ]
机构
[1] GKSS Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH, Inst Mat Res, Geesthacht, Germany
[2] IIT Madras, Dept Appl Mech, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Cohesive zone model; Ductile fracture; Triaxiality; Plane stress; Thin-walled structures; SIMULATION; FRACTURE; GROWTH; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.05.003
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Two different approaches that explicitly incorporate the stress triaxiality into cohesive zone models applicable to thin-walled structures are compared to identify the relative merits and limitation of these models. The number of model parameters involved, the ease of parameter determination and the predictive capabilities of the models over a wide range of thin-walled geometries are investigated. The first model, proposed recently by the authors, uses basic elastic-plastic constitutive equations combined with a model parameter depending on the average triaxiality in plane stress conditions. The second model incorporates stress-state through exponential dependence of cohesive strength on triaxiality, similar to plane strain studies earlier. The respective parameters for both models are identified and subsequently applied to several notched and precracked specimens. It is shown that in contrast to stress-state independent models, both constraint dependent models are able to predict well failure of a wide range of structures. While the model incorporating triaxiality dependent cohesive parameters has more parameters to be determined, it is not restricted to any specific stress condition and therefore can be extended to arbitrary three-dimensional stress-states. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 543
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stress State Dependent Cohesive Zone Model for Thin Walled Structures
    Rajendran, M.
    Scheider, Ingo
    Banerjee, Anuradha
    ADVANCES IN FRACTURE AND DAMAGE MECHANICS VIII, 2010, 417-418 : 353 - +
  • [2] Cohesive elements for thin-walled structures
    Scheider, I.
    Brocks, W.
    COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2006, 37 (1-2) : 101 - 109
  • [3] The Stress—Strain State of Thin-Walled Structures Exposed to Radiation
    D. V. Babich
    International Applied Mechanics, 2003, 39 : 953 - 960
  • [4] Stress-state dependent cohesive model for fatigue crack growth
    Kumar, R. Shravan
    Nijin, I. S.
    Bharadwaj, M. Vivek
    Rajkumar, G.
    Banerjee, Anuradha
    FRATTURA ED INTEGRITA STRUTTURALE, 2016, 10 (38): : 19 - 25
  • [5] Constraint Effects using a Stress-State Dependent Cohesive Model
    Kanhurkar, Nishant
    Rashid, Faizan Md.
    Banerjee, Anuradha
    20TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FRACTURE, 2014, 3 : 1244 - 1249
  • [6] Stress State and Strength of Thin-Walled Structures Under Nonisothermal Reloading
    M. O. Babeshko
    A. Z. Galishin
    V. G. Savchenko
    International Applied Mechanics, 2022, 58 : 683 - 694
  • [7] Stress State and Strength of Thin-Walled Structures Under Nonisothermal Reloading
    Babeshko, M. O.
    Galishin, A. Z.
    Savchenko, V. G.
    INTERNATIONAL APPLIED MECHANICS, 2022, 58 (06) : 683 - 694
  • [8] The stress-strain state of thin-walled structures exposed to radiation
    Babich, DV
    INTERNATIONAL APPLIED MECHANICS, 2003, 39 (08) : 953 - 960
  • [9] Assessment of the Cohesive Contact method for the analysis of thin-walled bonded structures
    Castagnetti, D.
    Spaggiari, A.
    Dragoni, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2012, 37 : 112 - 120
  • [10] Comparison of FEA for Different Type Element Models of Open Thin-Walled Member
    Xie, Yonglan
    Qi, Hu
    Lin, Bing
    Zhang, Qingyu
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 358