Seismic performance assessment of RC bridge piers designed with the Algerian seismic bridges regulation

被引:8
作者
Kehila, Fouad [1 ]
Kibboua, Abderrahmane [1 ]
Bechtoula, Hakim [1 ]
Remki, Mustapha [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Earthquake Engn Res Ctr CGS, Dept Civil Engn, 01 Rue Kaddour RAHIM,BP 252, Algiers, Algeria
关键词
fragility curves; seismic performance; damage states; vulnerability; pier bridge; FRAGILITY CURVES; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; METHODOLOGY; EARTHQUAKE; PREDICTION; MODELS; STATE;
D O I
10.12989/eas.2018.15.6.701
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Many bridges in Algeria were constructed without taking into account the seismic effect in the design. The implantation of a new regulation code RPOA-2008 requires a higher reinforcement ratio than with the seismic coefficient method, which is a common feature of the existing bridges. For better perception of the performance bridge piers and evaluation of the risk assessment of existing bridges, fragility analysis is an interesting tool to assess the vulnerability study of these structures. This paper presents a comparative performance of bridge piers designed with the seismic coefficient method and the new RPOA-2008. The performances of the designed bridge piers are assessed using thirty ground motion records and incremental dynamic analysis. Fragility curves for the bridge piers are plotted using probabilistic seismic demand model to perform the seismic vulnerability analysis. The impact of changing the reinforcement strength on the seismic behavior of the designed bridge piers is checked by fragility analysis. The fragility results reveal that the probability of damage with the RPOA-2008 is less and perform well comparing to the conventional design pier.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 713
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Alam MS, 2012, B EARTHQ ENG, V10, P1885, DOI 10.1007/s10518-012-9381-8
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PEER Ground Motion Database
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FEMA350
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ALG SEISM REG COD BR
[5]   Effect of abutment modeling on the seismic response of bridge structures [J].
Aviram, Ady ;
Mackie, Kevin R. ;
Stojadinovic, Bozidar .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2008, 7 (04) :395-402
[6]   Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis [J].
Baker, Jack W. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) :579-599
[7]   Mechanistic quantification of RC bridge damage states under earthquake through fragility analysis [J].
Banerjee, Swagata ;
Shinozuka, Masanobu .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 23 (01) :12-22
[8]   State-dependent fragility curves of bridges based on vibration measurements [J].
Banerjee, Swagata ;
Chi, Chao .
PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2013, 33 :116-125
[9]   Seismic performance of skewed highway bridges using analytical fragility function methodology [J].
Bayat, M. ;
Daneshjoo, F. .
COMPUTERS AND CONCRETE, 2015, 16 (05) :723-740
[10]   Seismic fragility curves of single storey RC precast structures by comparing different Italian codes [J].
Beilic, Dumitru ;
Casotto, Chiara ;
Nascimbene, Roberto ;
Cicola, Daniele ;
Rodrigues, Daniela .
EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2017, 12 (03) :359-374