Physical and psychological factors predict outcome following whiplash injury

被引:276
作者
Sterling, M [1 ]
Jull, G
Vicenzino, B
Kenardy, J
Darnell, R
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Whiplash Res Unit, Dept Physiotherapy, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Ctr Natl Res Disabil & Rehabil Med, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
whiplash injury; physical and psychological factors; NDI scores; prediction;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.005
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Predictors of outcome following whiplash injury are limited to socio-demographic and symptomatic factors, which are not readily amenable to secondary and tertiary intervention. This prospective study investigated the predictive capacity of early measures of physical and psychological impairment on pain and disability 6 months following whiplash injury. Motor function (ROM; kinaesthetic sense; activity of the superficial neck flexors (EMG) during cranio-cervical flexion), quantitative sensory testing (pressure, thermal pain thresholds, brachial plexus provocation test), sympathetic vasoconstrictor responses and psychological distress (GHQ-28, TSK, IES) were measured in 76 acute whiplash participants. The outcome measure was Neck Disability Index scores at 6 months. Stepwise regression analysis was used to predict the final NDI score. Logistic regression analyses predicted membership to one of the three groups based on final NDI scores (< 8 recovered, 10-28 mild pain and disability, > 30 moderate/severe pain and disability). Higher initial NDI score (1.007-1.12), older age (1.03-1.23), cold hyperalgesia (1.05-1.58), and acute post-traumatic stress (1.03-1.2) predicted membership to the moderate/severe group. Additional variables associated with higher NDI scores at 6 months on stepwise regression analysis were: ROM loss and diminished sympathetic reactivity. Higher initial NDI score (1.03-1.28), greater psychological distress (GHQ-28) (1.04-1.28) and decreased ROM (1.03-1.25) predicted subjects with persistent milder symptoms from those who fully recovered. These results demonstrate that both physical and psychological factors play a role in recovery or non-recovery from whiplash injury. This may assist in the development of more relevant treatment methods for acute whiplash. (c) 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Musculoskeletal Assessment: Joint Range of Motion and Manual Muscle Strength
[2]   Evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia [J].
Banic, B ;
Petersen-Felix, S ;
Andersen, OK ;
Radanov, BP ;
Villiger, PM ;
Arendt-Nielsen, L ;
Curatolo, M .
PAIN, 2004, 107 (1-2) :7-15
[3]   WHIPLASH INJURY [J].
BARNSLEY, L ;
LORD, S ;
BOGDUK, N .
PAIN, 1994, 58 (03) :283-307
[4]   Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. [J].
Cassidy, JD ;
Carroll, LJ ;
Coté, P ;
Lemstra, M ;
Berglund, A ;
Nygren, Å .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (16) :1179-1186
[5]  
Cote P, 2001, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), V26, pE445, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00020
[6]   Cervical range of motion discriminates between asymptomatic persons and those with whiplash [J].
Dall'Alba, PT ;
Sterling, MM ;
Treleaven, JM ;
Edwards, SL ;
Jull, GA .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (19) :2090-2094
[7]   Spinal nerve injury increases the percentage of cold-responsive DRG neurons [J].
Djouhri, L ;
Wrigley, D ;
Thut, PD ;
Gold, MS .
NEUROREPORT, 2004, 15 (03) :457-460
[8]  
Goldberg D., 1978, GEN HLTH QUESTIONNAI
[9]   Derivation of a clinical decision rule for whiplash associated disorders among individuals involved in rear-end collisions [J].
Hartling, L ;
Pickett, W ;
Brison, RJ .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2002, 34 (04) :531-539
[10]   Prognostic value of the Quebec classification of whiplash-associated disorders [J].
Hartling, L ;
Brison, RJ ;
Ardern, C ;
Pickett, W .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (01) :36-41