Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development: a European typology

被引:102
作者
Berisha, Erblin [1 ]
Cotella, Giancarlo [1 ]
Janin Rivolin, Umberto [1 ]
Solly, Alys [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning DIS, Viale Mattioli 39, I-10125 Turin, Italy
关键词
Spatial governance; spatial planning; spatial development; systems; public control; Europe; URBAN GOVERNANCE; LAND; NEOLIBERALISM; CRISIS; GREECE; REFORM; FACE;
D O I
10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although the functions of spatial governance and planning systems are generalizable, 30 years of comparative studies, especially in Europe, have shown the heterogeneity characterising these 'institutional technologies'. This contribution builds on the materials of the recently concluded ESPON COMPASS research project to propose a European typology on the capacity of public authorities to control spatial development, a crucial aspect for the life of entire cities, regions and countries. Based on the opinions expressed by respective national experts, the systems of 39 countries (28 EU and 11 non-EU) are compared in relation to the mechanisms to allocate land use and spatial development rights as well as to the prevalence of the state vs. the market in guiding the development decisions. As a result, the European systems are placed on an X-Y diagram, which makes it possible to cluster them in consistent types that raise new comparative observations and general findings. In summary, the capacity for public control of spatial development looks variegated in Europe, although limited overall. Even if the power relations between state and market established in each institutional context are certainly influential, the models adopted for allocating spatial development rights also play a role in determining the observed trends.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 200
页数:20
相关论文
共 70 条
[41]  
Kovachev A., 2017, SPATIUM, V37, P34, DOI [10.2298/SPAT1737034K, DOI 10.2298/SPAT1737034K]
[42]  
Kule L., 2011, CORE THEME LAND USE, P161
[43]   Effects of public perception on urban planning: evolution of an inclusive planning system during crises in Latvia [J].
Liepa-Zemesa, Mara ;
Hess, Daniel Baldwin .
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, 2016, 87 (01) :71-92
[44]   Bulldozer Neo-liberalism in Istanbul: The State-led Construction of Property Markets, and the Displacement of the Urban Poor [J].
Lovering, John ;
Turkmen, Hade .
INTERNATIONAL PLANNING STUDIES, 2011, 16 (01) :73-96
[45]  
Mazza L., 2015, PLANNING CITIZENSHIP
[46]  
Nadin V., 2008, DISP PLANNING REV, V44, P35, DOI [10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001]
[47]   Opening up the Compendium: An Evaluation of International Comparative Planning Research Methodologies [J].
Nadin, Vincent ;
Stead, Dominic .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2013, 21 (10) :1542-1561
[48]  
Nadin V, 2014, SPATIAL PLANNING SYSTEMS AND PRACTICES IN EUROPE: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON CONTINUITY AND CHANGES, P189
[49]  
Newman P., 1996, Urban Planning in Europe
[50]  
Notermans T., 2015, LOCALITIES, V5, P103, DOI [10.15299/local.2015.11.5.103, DOI 10.15299/LOCAL.2015.11.5.103]