Maintenance antisepsis in reducing the rate of late-onset central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: A comparison of 0.05% and 1% chlorhexidine

被引:7
|
作者
Kikuchi, Mizuka [1 ]
Sato, Tetsuya [1 ,2 ]
Okada, Shinji [1 ]
Abe, Noriko [1 ]
Sato, Asami [1 ]
Suzuki, Yasuko [1 ]
机构
[1] South Miyagi Med Ctr, Infect Control Div, Aza Nishi 38-1, Ogawara, Miyagi 9891253, Japan
[2] South Miyagi Med Ctr, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Aza Nishi 38-1, Ogawara, Miyagi 9891253, Japan
关键词
Central venous catheter; Catheter-related bloodstream infection; Chlorhexidine; Maintenance antisepsis; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; INTENSIVE-CARE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; POVIDONE-IODINE; PREVENTION; COLONIZATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jiac.2019.08.007
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Bundled measures have been recommended to reduce the risk of central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infection. However, the importance of each procedure involved in CVC insertion/management for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) has not been thoroughly assessed. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of maintenance antisepsis at the CVC insertion site in reducing the CRBSI risk through comparing the use of 0.05% chlorhexidine to 1% chlorhexidine. Patients and methods: In the South Miyagi Medical Center, Japan, 372 patients with a CVC who had undergone antisepsis maintenance using 0.05% chlorhexidine swabs 12 months prior to implementing 1% chlorhexidine swabs, and 344 patients at 12 months post-implementation of 1% chlorhexidine swabs, were followed prospectively for the development of CRBSI and signs of infection, and their data compared. Results: Post-implementation of the 1% chlorhexidine swabs, the CRBSI rate decreased from 3.64/1000 catheter-days to 1.77/1000 catheter-days. The risk of CRBSI decreased to 0.465 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.216-1.001). Furthermore, the risk of CRBSI >= 20 days after CVC insertion decreased to 0.200 (95% CI: 0.049-0.867); however, we found no difference between 0.05% and 1% chlorhexidine use within 19 days of CVC insertion. The increased number of patients with insertion site tenderness after implementing 1% chlorhexidine indicated a possible adverse effect of chlorhexidine. Conclusion: Maintenance antisepsis with 1% chlorhexidine decreased the risk of developing CRBSI >= 20 days after CVC insertion, indicating the effectiveness of antisepsis with 1% chlorhexidine. Our data highlight the importance of maintenance antisepsis in reducing the rate of late-phase CRBSI. (C) 2019 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 193
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dressing Change Reduces the Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection
    Ishizuka, Mitsuru
    Nagata, Hitoshi
    Takagi, Kazutoshi
    Kubota, Keiichi
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 58 (112) : 1882 - 1886
  • [2] Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter-related infections
    Lai, Nai Ming
    Lai, Nai An
    O'Riordan, Elizabeth
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    Taylor, Jacqueline E.
    Tan, Kenneth
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (07):
  • [3] Comparison of 0.05% Chlorhexidine and 10% Povidone-Iodine as Cutaneous Disinfectant for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection: A Comparative Study
    Ishizuka, M.
    Nagata, H.
    Takagi, K.
    Kubota, K.
    EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (03) : 286 - 290
  • [4] A new central venous catheter cap: decreased microbial growth and risk for catheter-related bloodstream infection
    Buchman, A. L.
    Spapperi, J.
    Leopold, P.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2009, 10 (01) : 11 - 21
  • [5] Reducing Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Children With Cancer
    Horvath, Brandi
    Norville, Robbie
    Lee, Deborah
    Hyde, Annie
    Gregurich, MaryAnn
    Hockenberry, Marilyn
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2009, 36 (02) : 232 - 238
  • [6] Femoral Venous Catheterization Is a Major Risk Factor for Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection
    Ishizuka, Mitsuru
    Nagata, Hitoshi
    Takagi, Kazutoshi
    Kubota, Keiichi
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2009, 22 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [7] Catheter-related bloodstream infection according to central venous accesses
    L Lorente Ramos
    C García
    J Iribarren
    J Castedo
    J Jiménez
    M Brouard
    C Henry
    R Santacreu
    M Martín
    M Mora
    Critical Care, 12 (Suppl 2):
  • [8] Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection and Cryptococcus neoformans
    Tuon, Felipe F.
    Morales, Hugo M. P.
    Penteado-Filho, Sergio R.
    da-Silva, Margarete M.
    de Quadros, Isabel
    El Hamoui, Amina
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 13 (04) : 317 - 318
  • [9] Needleless Closed System Does Not Reduce Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection: A Retrospective Study
    Ishizuka, Mitsuru
    Nagata, Hitoshi
    Takagi, Kazutoshi
    Kubota, Keiichi
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2013, 98 (01) : 88 - 93
  • [10] A multimodal approach to central venous catheter hub care can decrease catheter-related bloodstream infection
    Sannoh, Sulaiman
    Clones, Barbara
    Munoz, Jose
    Montecalvo, Marisa
    Parvez, Boriana
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2010, 38 (06) : 424 - 429