Metagoverning social work knowledge structures

被引:3
作者
Denvall, Verner [1 ]
Nordesjo, Kettil [2 ]
Johansson, Kerstin [3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Sch Social Work, Lund, Sweden
[2] Malmo Univ, Dept Social Work, Malmo, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Municipal Studies, Norrkoping, Sweden
关键词
Metagovernance; evidence-based practice; networks; government; social work; NETWORK GOVERNANCE; META-GOVERNANCE; ORGANIZATIONS; TRANSLATION; SERVICE; SCHOOLS;
D O I
10.1080/2156857X.2021.1893210
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The increasing fragmentation and the rising number of organizations in society create major challenges when implementing knowledge structures. In this article, we propose that the concept of metagovernance is useful when addressing these challenges. The enhancement of knowledge structures in the Swedish social services is our study object. Networks at national, regional and local levels have been organized and facilitated by national resources and agreements since 2003. The shifting of participants, switching assignments and ambiguity about the networks' purposes created difficult conditions for successful implementation. In this paper, we argue that fragile top-down government and shifting local network organization provide limited opportunities to ensure that new knowledge structures will have an impact on social work practice. Research is based upon monitoring a national program that started in 2003, affecting five universities and their surrounding regions and municipalities. The article is also based upon observations and interviews among national and regional actors. Results show that national agencies are hands-off, but still in control by setting up legal and discursive frameworks for those networks. It is argued that this creates new challenges for participating organizations and professionals in social work.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 822
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The sage handbook of governance
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, METAGOVERN POLICY NE
[3]   The Role of an Intermediary Organization in Promoting Research in Schools of Social Work: The Case of the Bay Area Social Services Consortium [J].
Anthony, Elizabeth K. ;
Austin, Michael J. .
SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (04) :287-293
[4]  
Austin M.J., 1999, Journal of Community Practice, V6, P89, DOI [10.1300/j125v06n03_05, DOI 10.1300/J125V06N03_05]
[5]   Ways of Understanding Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: A Qualitative Study [J].
Avby, Gunilla ;
Nilsen, Per ;
Dahlgren, Madeleine Abrandt .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2014, 44 (06) :1366-1383
[6]  
Barbeira M, 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, P37
[7]   AGENCY-UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP FOR EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN SOCIAL WORK [J].
Bellamy, Jennifer L. ;
Fang, Lin ;
Bledsoe, Sarah E. ;
Manuel, Jennifer I. ;
Mullen, Edward J. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2008, 44 (03) :55-75
[8]  
Bergmark A., 2011, Evidensbaserat socialt arbete
[9]  
Billsten J., 2019, THESIS
[10]   Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) test used in the implementation of assessment instruments and treatment methods in a Swedish National study [J].
Billsten, Johan ;
Fridell, Mats ;
Holmberg, Robert ;
Ivarsson, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2018, 84 :9-16