Recommendations for Toxicological Investigation of Drug-Impaired Driving and Motor Vehicle Fatalities-2021 Update

被引:45
作者
D'Orazio, Amanda L. [1 ,2 ]
Mohr, Amanda L. A. [1 ]
Chan-Hosokawa, Ayako [2 ]
Harper, Curt [3 ]
Huestis, Marilyn A. [4 ]
Limoges, Jennifer F. [5 ]
Miles, Amy K. [6 ]
Scarneo, Colleen E. [7 ]
Kerrigan, Sarah [8 ]
Liddicoat, Laura J. [1 ]
Scott, Karen S. [9 ]
Logan, Barry K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fredr Rieders Family Fdn, Ctr Forens Sci Res & Educ, 2300 Stratford Ave, Willow Grove, PA 19090 USA
[2] NMS Labs, 200 Welsh Rd, Horsham, PA 19044 USA
[3] Alabama Dept Forens Sci, 2026 Valleydale Rd, Hoover, AL 35244 USA
[4] Huestis & Smith Toxicol LLC, 683 Shore Rd, Severna Pk, MD 21146 USA
[5] New York State Police Forens Invest Ctr, 1220 Washington Ave,Bldg 30, Albany, NY 12226 USA
[6] Wisconsin State Lab Hyg, 2601 Agr Dr,POB 7996, Madison, WI 53707 USA
[7] New England Forens Toxicol LLC, POB 702, Concord, NH 03302 USA
[8] Sam Houston State Univ, 1003 Bowers Blvd, Huntsville, TX 77341 USA
[9] Arcadia Univ, 450 S Easton Rd, Glenside, PA 19038 USA
关键词
ORAL FLUID;
D O I
10.1093/jat/bkab064
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This report describes updates to the National Safety Council's Alcohol, Drugs and Impairment Division's recommendations for drug testing in driving under the influence of drug (DUID) cases and motor vehicle fatalities. The updates are based on a survey of drug testing practices in laboratories in the USA and Canada, a comprehensive review of the prior recommendations and data and research on drugs most frequently detected in DUID cases. A consensus meeting was held with representative forensic science practitioners and the authors of this report to update recommendations. No changes were made to the Tier I scope; however, there were changes to cutoffs of some analytes for blood, urine and oral fluid. Due to increased prevalence in DUID cases, trazodone and difluoroethane were added to the Tier II scope. For clarification, Tier I cutoffs reflect free concentrations, and hydrolysis is recommended but not required. The consensus panel concluded that urine is an inferior matrix to blood and oral fluid as it may represent historical use or exposure unrelated to observed impairment; therefore, future iterations of these recommendations will not include urine as a recommended matrix. Laboratories currently testing urine should work with traffic safety partners to encourage the use of blood and oral fluid as more appropriate specimens and adjust their capabilities to provide that testing.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 536
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
American Automobile Association, 2020, AAA
[2]   Detection of Drugs in Simultaneously Collected Samples of Oral Fluid and Blood [J].
Bakke, Eirin ;
Hoiseth, Gudrun ;
Arnestad, Marianne ;
Gjerde, Hallvard .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 43 (03) :228-232
[3]   Oral Fluid Testing for Drugs of Abuse [J].
Bosker, Wendy M. ;
Huestis, Marilyn A. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 55 (11) :1910-1931
[4]  
Committee CH039, 2019, 47602019 ASNZS 47602019 ASNZS
[5]  
Construction Opportunities Development Council Inc, 2018, ALC DRUG POL PROC ALC DRUG POL PROC
[6]  
Construction Owners Association of Alberta, 2018, ALC DRUG GUID WORK R ALC DRUG GUID WORK R
[7]   Oral fluid collection: The neglected variable in oral fluid testing [J].
Crouch, DJ .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 150 (2-3) :165-173
[8]   Retrospective Analysis of Synthetic Cannabinoid Metabolites in Urine of Individuals Suspected of Driving Impaired [J].
Davies, Bronwen B. ;
Bayard, Ciena ;
Larson, Scott J. ;
Zarwell, Lucas W. ;
Mitchell, Roger A. .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :89-96
[9]   Oral Fluid Drug Testing: Analytical Approaches, Issues and Interpretation of Results [J].
Desrosiers, Nathalie A. ;
Huestis, Marilyn A. .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 43 (06) :415-443
[10]  
Drummer Olaf H, 2006, Clin Biochem Rev, V27, P147