The Long-Run Discount Rate Controversy

被引:70
作者
Gollier, Christian [1 ]
Hammitt, James K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] TSE, LERNA INRA, F-31042 Toulouse, France
[2] Harvard Univ, Ctr Risk Anal, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 6 | 2014年 / 6卷
关键词
climate change; sustainable development; valuation of environmental assets; value of statistical life; VSL; DISTANT FUTURE; STOCHASTIC CONSUMPTION; TEMPORAL BEHAVIOR; RARE DISASTERS; RISK-AVERSION; ASSET PRICES; ECONOMICS; HEALTH; EXPECTATIONS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012516
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The choice of the rate at which one should discount the long-term benefits of mitigating climate change is highly controversial. Both the level and the slope of the term structure of discount rates have been discussed intensively in relation to the determination of the social cost of carbon. Although some of the parameters of the problem are ethical and outside the scope of economic analysis, we claim that there are converging and convincing arguments in favor of using an annual real risk-free discount rate going from approximately 4% to approximately 1% for maturities going from zero to infinity. Investing in climate mitigation yields highly uncertain future benefits. Such uncertainty should also be taken into account in the selection of the discount rate, although the appropriate approach is highly controversial.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 295
页数:23
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EC VOICE JUN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 201216 NOU NOR GOV N
[3]  
[Anonymous], P AUTE ED M APR 1976
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2357 CESIFO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Second Assessment Report
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NBER Working Paper Series, DOI 10.3386/W18315
[7]  
[Anonymous], GAMMA DISCOUNT UNPUB
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GREEN BOOK APPR EV C
[9]  
[Anonymous], 9501 CSERGE U E ANGL
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 17540 NBER