Process Evaluation of an Online SUpport PRogram for Older Hearing Aid Users Delivered in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
作者
Meijerink, Janine F. J. [1 ]
Pronk, Marieke [1 ]
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit, I [2 ]
Jansen, Vera [3 ]
Kramer, Sophia E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr UMC, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg,Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr UMC, Epidemiol & Data Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Schoonenberg HoorSupport, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
process evaluation; communication program; eHealth; hearing aid users; implementation; hearing aid dispensing practice; self-management; SIGNIFICANT OTHERS; SHORT-TERM; IMPAIRMENT; OUTCOMES; SERVICE; ADULTS; REHABILITATION; IMPLEMENTATION; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2021.725388
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the process of implementing a web-based support program (SUPR) for hearing aid users in the Dutch dispensing setting in order to allow interpretation of the randomized controlled trial's results (positive effects on hearing-aid related outcomes; no effects on psychosocial outcomes).</p> Design: Measures: context of implementation, recruitment, SUPR's: reach, implementation fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, satisfaction, and benefit. Data collection: quantitative and qualitative.</p> Study Sample: One hundred thirty-eight clients (mean age 68.1 years; 60% male) and 44 dispensers completed questionnaires. Five clients and 6 dispensers participated in interviews and focus groups.</p> Results: Clients and dispensers were generally satisfied with SUPR's usefulness. SUPR-videos were watched by 7-37% of the clients. Around half of the dispensers encouraged clients to watch them or informed them about SUPR. Some clients found the SUPR-materials suboptimal, and changes in personnel and limited dispenser-training were barriers acting on a contextual level.</p> Conclusions: This study identified several factors that contributed to the success of SUPR. Others factors, acting on various levels (e.g., intervention material, dispensers, and implementation context), were suboptimal and may explain the absent psychosocial effects. The identified factors are important to consider in further development of SUPR, and in other web-based support programs.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Hearing-aid use and its determinants in the UK National Health Service: A cross-sectional study at the Royal Surrey County Hospital
    Aazh, Hashir
    Prasher, Deepak
    Nanchahal, Kiran
    Moore, Brian C. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 (03) : 152 - 161
  • [2] Abrams H. B., 2015, Hearing Review, V22, P16
  • [3] Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation
    Barker, Fiona
    Mackenzie, Emma
    Elliott, Lynette
    Jones, Simon
    de Lusignan, Simon
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (08):
  • [4] Survey on hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants
    Bertoli, Sibylle
    Staehelin, Katharina
    Zemp, Elisabeth
    Schindler, Christian
    Bodmer, Daniel
    Probst, Rudolf
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 48 (04) : 183 - 195
  • [5] Boothroyd Arthur, 2007, Trends Amplif, V11, P63, DOI 10.1177/1084713807301073
  • [6] Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
  • [7] A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity
    Carroll, Christopher
    Patterson, Malcolm
    Wood, Stephen
    Booth, Andrew
    Rick, Jo
    Balain, Shashi
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2007, 2
  • [8] What brings you here today? The role of self-assessment in help-seeking for age-related hearing loss
    Carson, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES, 2005, 19 (02) : 185 - 200
  • [9] Short- and long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation
    Chisolm, TH
    Abrams, HB
    McArdle, R
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2004, 25 (05) : 464 - 477
  • [10] A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: Final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults
    Chisolm, Theresa Hnath
    Johnson, Carole E.
    Danhauer, Jeffrey L.
    Portz, Laural J. P.
    Abrams, Harvey B.
    Lesner, Sharon
    McCarthy, Patricia A.
    Newman, Craig W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2007, 18 (02) : 151 - 183