Multi-objective decision-making methods for optimising CO2 decisions in the automotive industry

被引:12
作者
Ibrahim, Nassir [1 ]
Cox, Sharon [1 ]
Mills, Robert [1 ]
Aftelak, Andrew [1 ]
Shah, Hanifa [1 ]
机构
[1] Birmingham City Univ, Fac Comp Engn & Built Environment, Birmingham B4 7AP, W Midlands, England
关键词
CO2 tariff minimisation; Profit maximisation; Financial cost; Multi-objective optimisation; Decision support model; Automotive OEMs; MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY-THEORY; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES; PASSENGER CARS; FUEL CONSUMPTION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CLIMATE POLICY; ECO-EFFICIENCY; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128037
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Multi-objective optimisation (MOOP) methods are used heavily to support decision-makers in addressing problems with conflicting objectives. With global CO2 emission legislation becoming stringent, automotive OEMs face a challenge to balance conflicting commercial and environmental objectives simultaneously. Automotive OEMs seek to maximise profits by stimulating global sales volumes whilst also minimising CO2 management costs. MOOP methods can quantify CO2 management costs to optimise decisions in response to the increasingly regulated business environment. Whilst automotive OEMs are modelling the dynamic knock-on effects of pursuing multiple objectives, there is also a need to formulate their decision objectives, decision criteria and decision options to be considered as part of CO2 management decisions first. A systematic literature review offers a detailed account of how automotive OEMs can optimise CO2 management decisions. The multiple decision objectives, decision criteria and CO2 management decision options considered by automotive OEMs are first categorised. The systematic literature review reveals that evaluating decision criteria such as the vehicle fleet portfolio, customer demand, market requirements and financial cost can assist automotive OEMs select the optimal CO2 management decision in a given scenario. Next, reconfiguring vehicle features, investing in technology, restricting sales and paying CO2 tariffs are identified as the most common CO2 management decisions taken by automotive OEMs. Then MOOP methods are critiqued for their suitability, before a novel decision support model, which adopts an automotive OEMs' perspective for mitigating CO2 management costs is proposed. It is found that interactive and objective decision making approaches such as MOOP opposed to classical Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods can more precisely quantify the commercial implications of the stricter global CO2 emission legislation now imposed on automotive OEMs. If automotive OEMs adopt the proposed model, they can effectively model future CO2 management scenarios and pre-emptively prevent counter-productive decisions by minimising CO2 management costs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 203 条
[11]   A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi ;
Yazdani, Morteza ;
Ignatius, Joshua .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) :13051-13069
[12]   PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Kazemadeh, R. B. ;
Albadvi, A. ;
Aghdasi, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 200 (01) :198-215
[13]  
Benayoun R., 1966, Note de Travail 49
[14]   An Econometric Dynamic Model to estimate passenger demand for air transport industry [J].
Bernardo Carmona-Benitez, Rafael ;
Rosa Nieto, Maria ;
Miranda, Danya .
WORLD CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORT RESEARCH - WCTR 2016, 2017, 25 :17-29
[15]   Comparative analysis of UTA multicriteria methods [J].
Beuthe, M ;
Scannella, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 130 (02) :246-262
[16]   Modeling the uptake of plug-in vehicles in a heterogeneous car market using a consumer segmentation approach [J].
Brand, Christian ;
Cluzel, Celine ;
Anable, Jillian .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 97 :121-136
[17]  
Brans J.P., 2016, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, V233, P187, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_6
[18]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[19]   CO2 Emissions Reduction via 48V Active Engine-Off Coasting [J].
Brown, Alan ;
Nalbach, Marc ;
Kahnt, Sebastian ;
Korner, Andre .
SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE POWERTRAINS, 2016, 5 (01) :68-78
[20]   Goal programming application for the decision support in the daily production planning of sawmills [J].
Broz, Diego ;
Vanzett, Nicolas ;
Corsano, Gabriela ;
Montagna, Jorge M. .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 102 :29-40