Heidegger's early critique of Husserl

被引:7
作者
Overgaard, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Danish Natl Res Fdn, Ctr Subject Res, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Husserl; Heidegger; phenomenology; ontology; epoche; terminology;
D O I
10.1080/0967255032000074163
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This paper examines Heidegger's critique of Husserl in its earliest extant formulation, viz. the lecture courses Ontologie from 1923 and Einfuhrung in die phanomenologische Forschung from 1923/4. Commentators frequently ignore these lectures, but I try to show that a study of them can reveal both the extent to which Heidegger remains. committed to phenomenological research in something like its Husserlian form, and when and why Heidegger must part with Husserl. More specifically, I claim that Heidegger rightly criticizes Husserl's account of 'equipmental objects', and that he is especially unsatisfied with the terminology in which Husserl presents his phenomenological analyses, not only of 'equipment', but of other types of entities as well. However, it will also emerge that Heidegger's own phenomenological work presupposes the performance of what Husserl calls the 'epoche', the method of 'bracketing' natural knowledge. In this way, Heidegger's sometimes very severe critique must be understood as an internal critique.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 175
页数:19
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DIALECTIC DIFFERENCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], HUA 10 PHANOMENOLOGI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1967, WAHRHEITSBEGRIF BEI
[4]  
[Anonymous], READING HEIDEGGER ST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SELBSTTAUSCHUNG SELB
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1993, INTENTIONALITY HUSSE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-8145-5
[7]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL TRANSCENDENT
[8]   HUSSERL AND HEIDEGGER ON INTENTIONALITY AND BEING [J].
BERNET, R .
JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY, 1990, 21 (02) :136-152
[9]  
BIEMEL W, 1962, HUA 9 PHANOMENOLOGIE
[10]  
BOEHM R, 1959, HUA 8 ERSTE PHILOS 1