Continuing medical education, professional development, and requirements for medical licensure: A white paper of the conjoint committee on continuing medical education

被引:37
作者
Miller, Stephen H. [1 ]
Thompson, James N. [2 ]
Mazmanian, Paul E. [3 ]
Aparicio, Alejandro [4 ]
Davis, David A. [5 ,6 ]
Spivey, Bruce E. [7 ,8 ]
Kahn, Norman B., Jr. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Federat State Med Boards, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Amer Med Assoc, Div Continuing Phys Profess Dev, Chicago, IL 60610 USA
[5] Assoc Amer Med Coll, Washington, DC USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[7] Council Med Specialty Soc, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Int Council Ophthalmol, San Francisco, CA USA
[9] Council Med Specialty Soc, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
continuing medical education; medical license; legislated topics; physician assessment; competence; performance improvement;
D O I
10.1002/chp.164
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To provide the best care to patients, a physician must commit to lifelong learning, but continuing education and evaluation systems in the United States typically require little more than records of attendance for professional association memberships, hospital staff privileges, or reregistration of a medical license. While 61 of 68 medical and osteopathic licensing boards mandate that physicians participate in certain numbers of hours of continuing medical education (CME), 17 of them require physicians to participate in legislatively mandated topics that may have little to do with the types of patients seen by the applicant physician. Required CME should evolve from counting hours of CME participation to recognizing physician achievement in knowledge, competence, and performance. State medical boards should require valid and reliable assessment of physicians' learning needs and collaborate with physician and CME communities to assure that legislatively mandated CME achieves maximal benefit for physicians and patients. To assure the discovery and use of best practices for continuing professional development and for maintenance of competence, research in CME and physician assessment should be raised as a national priority.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 98
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] *AM MED ASS, 2007, STAT MED LIC REQ STA
  • [2] *AM OST ASS, QUAL RES AOA IN
  • [3] [Anonymous], PHYS RES CME
  • [4] The continued evolution of the credit system
    Aparicio, A
    Willis, CE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2005, 25 (03) : 190 - 196
  • [5] Impact of formal continuing medical education - Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?
    Davis, D
    O'Brien, MAT
    Freemantle, N
    Wolf, FM
    Mazmanian, P
    Taylor-Vaisey, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (09): : 867 - 874
  • [6] DAVIS DA, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V274, P700
  • [7] Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence - A systematic review
    Davis, David A.
    Mazmanian, Paul E.
    Fordis, Michael
    Van Harrison, R.
    Thorpe, Kevin E.
    Perrier, Laure
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 296 (09): : 1094 - 1102
  • [8] *FED STAT MED BOAR, FSMB MISS VIS COR VA
  • [9] *FL DEP HLTH FL BO, CONT MED ED CME
  • [10] Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
    Grimshaw, JM
    Thomas, RE
    MacLennan, G
    Fraser, C
    Ramsay, CR
    Vale, L
    Whitty, P
    Eccles, MP
    Matowe, L
    Shirran, L
    Wensing, M
    Dijkstra, R
    Donaldson, C
    [J]. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2004, 8 (06) : 1 - +