Comparison of Bursting Pressure after Scleral Tunnel Incision Sealed with Sutures or an Adherent Ocular Bandage in Human Globes

被引:1
作者
Jun, E. J. [3 ]
Kim, J. H. [2 ]
Purcell, T. L. [1 ]
Schanzlin, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Shiley Eye Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Inje Univ Korea, Ilsan Paik Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Goyang, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, St Pauls Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
ADHERENT OCULAR BANDAGE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL HYDROGEL; BURSTING PRESSURE; SCLERAL TUNNEL INCISION; SCLERAL SUTURE; HUMAN GLOBE; CONGENITAL CATARACT-SURGERY; CLEAR CORNEAL INCISIONS; TISSUE ADHESIVE; POSTOPERATIVE ENDOPHTHALMITIS; BACTERIAL ENDOPHTHALMITIS; 2-OCTYL CYANOACRYLATE; MERSILENE SUTURES; REMOVAL; CLOSURE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/147323001204000241
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of a hydrogel adherent ocular bandage for sealing of scleral tunnel incisions in human eye globes. METHODS: A 4-mm scleral tunnel incision was made in each of 10 globes and bursting pressure was measured using the Seidel test to check for wound leakage. Globes were sealed using either two interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures (n = 5) or an adherent ocular bandage in the form of polyethylene glycol hydrogel (n = 5). Bursting pressure was then measured for a second time. RESULTS: Bursting pressure was significantly higher after wound sealing in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in bursting pressure between the two groups before or after sealing. CONCLUSIONS: The adherent ocular bandage successfully protected the incision in ex vivo human globes immediately after surgery, with a sealing efficiency comparable to two nylon sutures, suggesting that it is a safe and effective alternative to conventional suturing.
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 760
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Prospective, randomized vector analysis of astigmatism after three-, one-, and no-suture phacoemulsification
    Azar, DT
    Stark, WJ
    Dodick, J
    Khoury, JM
    Vitale, S
    Enger, C
    Reed, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 23 (08) : 1164 - 1173
  • [2] The removal of 10/0 polyester (Mersilene) sutures after small incision congenital cataract surgery
    Bar-Sela, S. M.
    Spierer, O.
    Spierer, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 18 (01) : 82 - 86
  • [3] Suture-related complications after congenital cataract surgery: Vicryl versus Mersilene sutures
    Bar-Sela, Shai M.
    Spierer, Oriel
    Spierer, Abraham
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 33 (02) : 301 - 304
  • [4] BINDER PS, 1985, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V92, P1412
  • [5] Adherent ocular bandage for clear corneal incisions used in cataract surgery
    Calladine, Daniel
    Ward, Mina
    Packard, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (11) : 1839 - 1848
  • [6] Chan Stanley M, 2004, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V15, P305, DOI 10.1097/00055735-200408000-00005
  • [7] Sealing and Healing of Clear Corneal Incisions with an Improved Dextran Aldehyde-PEG Amine Tissue Adhesive
    Chenault, H. Keith
    Bhatia, Sujata K.
    DiMaio, William G., Jr.
    Vincent, Grant L.
    Camacho, Walter
    Behrens, Ashley
    [J]. CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2011, 36 (11) : 997 - 1004
  • [8] Effect of prophylactic antibiotics and incision type on the incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery
    Colleaux, KM
    Hamilton, WK
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2000, 35 (07): : 373 - 378
  • [9] Bacterial endophthalmitis after suture removal
    Culbert, RB
    Devenyi, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 25 (05) : 725 - 727
  • [10] SUTURE EROSION AFTER PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY
    DANA, MR
    GOREN, MB
    GOMES, JAP
    LAIBSON, PR
    RAPUANO, CJ
    COHEN, EJ
    [J]. CORNEA, 1995, 14 (03) : 243 - 248