The Troika paradox

被引：5

作者：

Blavatskyy, Pavlo R.

机构：

来源：

ECONOMICS LETTERS | 2012年 / 115卷 / 02期

关键词：

Risk; Expected utility; Non-expected utility; Risk aversion; Preference reversal; PREFERENCE REVERSAL; PROSPECT-THEORY; UTILITY; RISK; UNCERTAINTY; DECISIONS; AVERSION; CHOICES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.042

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

In three binary choice problems, people reveal a choice pattern which falsifies expected utility theory and many generalized non-expected utility theories. This new paradox challenges popular non-expected utility models analogously to how the Allais paradox challenged neoclassical expected utility theory. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：236 / 239

页数：4

共 28 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1860, ELEMENTS PSYCHOPHYSI

[2]

[Anonymous], 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE

[3] A GENERALIZATION OF THE QUASILINEAR MEAN WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE MEASUREMENT OF INCOME INEQUALITY AND DECISION-THEORY RESOLVING THE ALLAIS PARADOX [J].