Comparison of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for pain control in hip fractures: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

被引:42
|
作者
Mosaffa, Faramarz [1 ]
Taheri, Mehrdad [1 ]
Rasi, Alireza Manafi [2 ]
Samadpour, Hamidreza [1 ]
Memary, Elham [1 ]
Mirkheshti, Alireza [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthoped, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Hip fractures; Analgesia; Local anesthetics;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103135
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a common regional analgesic strategy in hip fracture surgery but, recently it has been suggested that FICB may not provide enough analgesia. Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) is a novel method for hip analgesia which its efficacy is not well established yet. The aim of this study was to the effect of the PENG block in the control of the hip fracture pain as well as to compare the effectiveness of the PENG compared with FICB. Hypothesis: The hypothesis of this study was that the PENG block could be a good alternative to the FICB in hip fracture analgesia. Materials and methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the Imam- Hossein Hospital, Tehran, Iran; between 2018 and 2019. Hip fracture patients were randomly divided into two groups; Group A (n=22) received FICB and Group B (n=30) received PENG block. Results: There was no significant difference between VAS score before blocks procedure between two groups (p= 0.37). After 15 minutes of blocks and after 12 hours of post-surgery, VAS score significantly reduced in the PENG block group compared with the FICB group (p= 0.031; p= 0.021, respectively). The first time of the analgesic consumption after surgery was significantly longer in the PENG block compared with the FCIB (p = 0.007). Compared with the FICB group, the total dose of morphine consumption during 24 hours significantly reduced in the PENG block (p = 0.008). Conclusion: PENG block is a good method in hip fractures analgesia and provides better analgesia than FICB. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are required to validate the efficacy and superiority of the PENG blocks over conventional techniques. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
    Ludan Liang
    Can Zhang
    Wei Dai
    Kaihua He
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2023, 37 : 503 - 510
  • [2] Comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
    Liang, Ludan
    Zhang, Can
    Dai, Wei
    He, Kaihua
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2023, 37 (04) : 503 - 510
  • [3] Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block versus Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Choi, Yong Seon
    Park, Kwan Kyu
    Lee, Bora
    Nam, Won Seok
    Kim, Do-Hyeong
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [4] Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Hip and Femur Fractures in the Emergency Department: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study
    Sahu, A.
    Sinha, T.
    Bhoi, S.
    Aggarwal, P.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 82 (04) : S12 - S12
  • [5] Comparison of analgesic effect of pericapsular nerve group block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block on dynamic pain in patients with hip fractures: a randomized controlled trial
    Koh, Won Uk
    Kim, Hyungtae
    Kim, Yeon Ju
    Park, Ji In
    Yeo, Hyun-Jin
    Ro, Young-Jin
    Kim, Ha-Jung
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [6] Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty
    Aliste, Julian
    Layera, Sebastian
    Bravo, Daniela
    Jara, Alvaro
    Munoz, Gonzalo
    Barrientos, Cristian
    Wulf, Rodrigo
    Branez, Julian
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    Tran, De Q.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (10) : 874 - 878
  • [7] Comparison of the efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) in total hip arthroplasty: A randomized control trial
    Vamshi, Chethan
    Sinha, Chandni
    Kumar, Ajeet
    Kumar, Abhyuday
    Kumari, Poonam
    Kumar, Amarjeet
    Kumar, Sudeep
    Arun, S. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 67 (04) : 364 - 369
  • [8] Comparison of continuous pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus continuous fascia iliaca compartment block on pain management and quadriceps muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study
    Duan, Lei
    Zhang, Liang
    Shi, Chuang-Guo
    Huang, Li-Gang
    Ao, Hui
    Wang, Ze-Peng
    Deng, Yue
    Sun, Meng-Liang
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [9] Comparison of continuous pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus continuous fascia iliaca compartment block on pain management and quadriceps muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study
    Lei Duan
    Liang Zhang
    Chuang-Guo Shi
    Li-Gang Huang
    Hui Ao
    Ze-Peng Wang
    Yue Deng
    Meng-Liang Sun
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [10] Comparison of the Effect of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
    Liu, Menglin
    Gao, Mingyang
    Hu, Yufei
    Ren, Xiaoqin
    Li, Yanan
    Gao, Fang
    Dong, Jianglong
    Dong, Jiangtao
    Wang, Qiujun
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 1651 - 1661