Indicators of urban climate resilience (case study: Varamin, Iran)

被引:12
作者
Barzaman, Sepideh [1 ]
Shamsipour, Aliakbar [2 ]
Lakes, Tobia [3 ]
Faraji, Abdollah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zanjan, Fac Literature, Dept Geog, Zanjan, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Fac Geog, Dept Phys Geog, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Humboldt Berlin, Dept Geog, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Urban climate resilience; ANP; UHI; Environmental planning; Varamin city; NETWORK MEASUREMENT PROCESSES; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; PROCESS ANP; SUSTAINABILITY; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-021-05174-x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Natural and man-made disasters caused by global climate change affect inhabitant health and well-being in the urban environments. One of the main issues in environmental planning in any form of residential area is monitoring the resilience of such disasters. This challenge has become more complicated when considering socio-ecological aspects of human-environmental systems and different types of land use and land cover in the resilience assessment process. In the present study, the resilience of Varamin, Iran, concerning climate change has been investigated through Analytic Network Process (ANP). The prominent components and indicators of climate resilience in the city were extracted using various datasets, field surveys, interviewing 44 urban planning experts through a questionnaire, and the Delphi method. Four components and 33 indicators were obtained based on the climatic resilience factor and integrated using the ANP model. A total of 393 citizens of Varamin city were invited to complete a questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed based on four environmental, socio-economical, infrastructural, and institutional components. According to the survey, the highest priority in climate resilience was for people who live in primary settlements. The city officials must pay special attention to these areas to make the city resilient and consider it a priority in their planning. Also, the climate change risks factor in resilience from the citizens' point of view was 2.15, which is less than the desired average and indicates habitat vulnerability against climate change. In addition, socio-economical and infrastructural components had higher resilience than environmental and institutional components. According to the suggestions of the citizens, the cooperation of government, local institutions, and educational organizations is effective in reducing and adapting to the effects of climate change and improving urban resilience.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 143
页数:25
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Aldrich D., 2010, J. Homel. Secur.
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, TEHRAN ENV DEP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 966 WMO
[5]  
Atta-Ur-Rahman, 2015, DISAST RISK REDUCT, P295, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55369-4_16
[6]  
Bastaminia A., 2019, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V8, P209
[7]   The size, scale, and shape of cities [J].
Batty, Michael .
SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5864) :769-771
[8]  
Becker P., 2014, Sustainability science: Managing risk and resilience for sustainable development
[9]  
Bokaie M, 2019, INT J URBAN SCI, V23, P269
[10]   Integrating the analytic network process (ANP) and the driving force-pressure-state-impactresponses (DPSIR) model for the sustainability assessment of territorial transformations [J].
Bottero, Marta ;
Ferretti, Valentina .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2010, 21 (05) :618-644