The effects of pulse configuration on magnetic stimulation

被引:4
作者
Al-Mutawaly, N
de Bruin, H
Hasey, G
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Psychiat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
magnetic stimulation; biphasic stimulating pulse; monophasic stimulating pulse; peripheral nerve stimulation; stimulus site;
D O I
10.1097/00004691-200309000-00008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
A study is presented in which the authors have examined the effects of pulse configuration, stimulation intensity, and coil current direction during magnetic stimulation. Using figure-8 and circular coils, the median nerve was stimulated at the cubital fossa and at the wrist of 10 healthy volunteers, and the response amplitude and site of stimulation were determined. The key findings of this study are in agreement with other researchers' findings and confirm that biphasic stimulating pulses produce significantly higher M-wave amplitudes than monophasic stimulating pulses for the same stimulus intensity. Mean response amplitudes for biphasic stimuli applied by both coils at the elbow and wrist are consistently higher for the normal current direction. Mean response amplitudes for monophasic pulses are almost always higher for reversed currents. The site for effective stimulation (the position of the virtual cathode) cannot be defined within a fixed distance from the center of the coil (3 to 4 cm), as has been suggested by other researchers, but was found to vary depending on the coil current amplitude and direction as well as the degree of inhomogeneity of the tissues surrounding the nerve. There is a statistically significant relationship between virtual cathode shift and stimulus intensity for biphasic and monophasic pulses. Reversing the coil current direction has no statistically significant effect on the virtual cathode position. Virtual cathode shifts can be measured for biphasic and monophasic stimulations using a figure-8 coil at the wrist and the elbow. However, such a shift is difficult to determine with a circular coil.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 370
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ALMUTAWALY N, 2002, INT J BIOELECTROMAGN, V4, P195
[2]  
ALMUTAWALY N, 2002, INT J BIOELECTROMAGN, V4, P193
[3]   STIMULATION OF A MYELINATED NERVE AXON BY ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION [J].
BASSER, PJ ;
ROTH, BJ .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1991, 29 (03) :261-268
[4]   Mixed nerve conduction studies of the median and ulnar nerves [J].
Buschbacher, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1999, 78 (06) :S69-S74
[5]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation - Which part of the current waveform causes the stimulation? [J].
Corthout, E ;
Barker, AT ;
Cowey, A .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 141 (01) :128-132
[6]  
*DANT INC, 1993, DANT MAGN STIM MAGP
[7]   THE DUAL EFFECT OF MEMBRANE POTENTIAL ON SODIUM CONDUCTANCE IN THE GIANT AXON OF LOLIGO [J].
HODGKIN, AL ;
HUXLEY, AF .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1952, 116 (04) :497-506
[8]   Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types [J].
Kammer, T ;
Beck, S ;
Thielscher, A ;
Laubis-Herrmann, U ;
Topka, H .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (02) :250-258
[9]   Importance of soft tissue inhomogeneity in magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation [J].
Kobayashi, M ;
Ueno, S ;
Kurokawa, T .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 105 (05) :406-413
[10]   Influence of pulse sequence, polarity and amplitude on magnetic stimulation of human and porcine peripheral nerve [J].
Maccabee, PJ ;
Nagarajan, SS ;
Amassian, VE ;
Durand, DM ;
Szabo, AZ ;
Ahad, AB ;
Cracco, RQ ;
Lai, KS ;
Eberle, LP .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1998, 513 (02) :571-585