The Global Platform Economy: A New Offshoring Institution Enabling Emerging-Economy Microproviders

被引:160
作者
Lehdonvirta, Vili [1 ]
Kassi, Otto [1 ]
Hjorth, Isis [1 ]
Barnard, Helena [2 ]
Graham, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
selection/staffing; developing countries; international management; transaction cost economics; COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN; STATISTICAL DISCRIMINATION; INTERNATIONAL-BUSINESS; SIGNALING THEORY; SHARING ECONOMY; LABOR-MARKET; GIG ECONOMY; SERVICES; INFORMATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1177/0149206318786781
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Global online platforms match firms with service providers around the world, in services ranging from software development to copywriting and graphic design. Unlike in traditional offshore outsourcing, service providers are predominantly one-person microproviders located in emerging-economy countries not necessarily associated with offshoring and often disadvantaged by negative country images. How do these microproviders survive and thrive? We theorize global platforms through transaction cost economics (TCE), arguing that they are a new technology-enabled offshoring institution that emerges in response to cross-border information asymmetries that hitherto prevented microproviders from participating in offshoring markets. To explain how platforms achieve this, we adapt signaling theory to a TCE-based model and test our hypotheses by analyzing 6 months of transaction records from a leading platform. To help interpret the results and generalize them beyond a single platform, we introduce supplementary data from 107 face-to-face interviews with microproviders in Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Individuals choose microprovidership when it provides a better return on their skills and labor than employment at a local (offshoring) firm. The platform acts as a signaling environment that allows microproviders to inform foreign clients of their quality, with platform-generated signals being the most informative signaling type. Platform signaling disproportionately benefits emerging-economy providers, allowing them to partly overcome the effects of negative country images and thus diminishing the importance of home country institutions. Global platforms in other factor and product markets likely promote cross-border microbusiness through similar mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 599
页数:33
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Agrawal A. K., 2013, 18720 NAT BUR EC RES
[2]   MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) :488-500
[3]   Employer learning and statistical discrimination [J].
Altonji, JG ;
Pierret, CR .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :313-350
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms
[5]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF LEARNING BY DOING [J].
ARROW, KJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1962, 29 (80) :155-173
[6]   What has economics to say about racial discrimination? [J].
Arrow, KJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 12 (02) :91-100
[7]  
Barley S.R., 2006, Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy
[8]   The Immigrant Earnings Disadvantage across the Earnings and Skills Distributions: The Case of Immigrants from the EU's New Member States [J].
Barrett, Alan ;
McGuinness, Seamus ;
O'Brien, Martin .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2012, 50 (03) :457-481
[9]  
Becker G. S., 1957, The economics of discrimination
[10]  
Beitin B. K., 2012, SAGE HDB INTERVIEW R, DOI [10.4135/9781452218403, DOI 10.4135/9781452218403.N17]