Donor-site morbidity of ear cartilage autografts

被引:35
作者
Mischkowski, Robert A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Domingos-Hadamitzky, Catarina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Siessegger, Matthias [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zinser, Max J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zoeller, Joachim E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Dept Craniomaxillofac & Plast Surg, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[2] Porz Rhein Hosp, Dept Visceral Trauma & Vasc Surg, Cologne, Germany
[3] Aesthet Med Koln, Cologne, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000293879.46560.4c
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The external ear provides a versatile cartilage source for reconstructive procedures, especially for augmentative rhinoplasty. The authors evaluated the short- and long-term morbidity associated with ear cartilage harvest using concha, tragus, and scapha as donor sites. Methods: The study included 52 patients in whom a cartilage graft from the external ear was harvested between February of 2001 and June of 2005. Donorsite morbidity was assessed in the early postoperative follow-up period. Twenty-eight patients were examined within a follow-up time of 3 to 168 months. Long-term morbidity assessment included documentation of patients' subjective complaints, clinical examination of the donor site, and anthropometric measurements. Results: The relevant morbidity factors in the early postoperative period were hematoma formation (6.7 percent) and sensory impairment (3.3 percent). In long-term follow-up, sensory impairment was the most frequent condition objectively assessed and subjectively complained of (12.9 percent). Overall, sensory impairment was confined to concha as the donor site. Anthropometric measurements showed a mean difference in the length of the affected ear compared with the contralateral ear of 1.8 mm, a width difference of 2.5 mm, a difference in tragus/lateral canthus distance of 1.4 mm, and a difference in protrusion angle of 2.4 degrees. Statistically significant differences between values obtained from operated and nonoperated ears could not be detected for every evaluated parameter using the paired t test. Aesthetically relevant complications were rare and their occurrence restricted to single cases. Conclusion: Cartilage graft harvest from the auricle can be considered as a relatively safe procedure with a favorable aesthetic outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Tragal cartilage grafts in aesthetic rhinoplasty
    Kotzur, A
    Gubisch, W
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 27 (03) : 232 - 236
  • [2] Mitz V, 1996, Ann Chir Plast Esthet, V41, P68
  • [3] Nolst Trenite GJ, 1998, RHINOPLASTY, P49
  • [4] THE USE OF CARTILAGE GRAFTS IN PRIMARY AESTHETIC RHINOPLASTY
    ORTIZMONASTERIO, F
    OLMEDO, A
    OSCOY, LO
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1981, 67 (05) : 597 - 605
  • [5] PECK GC, 1988, CLIN PLAST SURG, V15, P29
  • [6] TIP GRAFT - A 20-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE
    SHEEN, JH
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 91 (01) : 48 - 63
  • [7] TARDY ME, 1985, LARYNGOSCOPE, V95, P523
  • [8] WEERDA H, 2004, CHIRURGIE OHRMUSCHEL, P1