Determination of Confidence Intervals in Non-normal Data: Application of the Bootstrap to Cocaine Concentration in Femoral Blood

被引:28
作者
Desharnais, Brigitte [1 ,2 ]
Camirand-Lemyre, Felix [3 ]
Mireault, Pascal [1 ]
Skinner, Cameron D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lab Sci Judiciaires & Med Legale, Dept Toxicol, Montreal, PQ H2K 3S7, Canada
[2] Concordia Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Montreal, PQ H4B 1R6, Canada
[3] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Math, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jat/bku127
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Calculating the confidence interval is a common procedure in data analysis and is readily obtained from normally distributed populations with the familiar (x) over bar +/- (t x s)/root n formula. However, when working with non-normally distributed data, determining the confidence interval is not as obvious. For this type of data, there are fewer references in the literature, and they are much less accessible. We describe, in simple language, the percentile and bias-corrected and accelerated variations of the bootstrap method to calculate confidence intervals. This method can be applied to a wide variety of parameters (mean, median, slope of a calibration curve, etc.) and is appropriate for normal and non-normal data sets. As a worked example, the confidence interval around the median concentration of cocaine in femoral blood is calculated using bootstrap techniques. The median of the non-toxic concentrations was 46.7 ng/mL with a 95% confidence interval of 23.9-85.8 ng/mL in the non-normally distributed set of 45 postmortem cases. This method should be used to lead to more statistically sound and accurate confidence intervals for non-normally distributed populations, such as reference values of therapeutic and toxic drug concentration, as well as situations of truncated concentration values near the limit of quantification or cutoff of a method.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 117
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Carpenter J, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P1141, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000515)19:9<1141::AID-SIM479>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-F
[3]  
DICICCIO TJ, 1988, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V50, P338
[4]  
Fisher NI., 1990, AUST J STAT, V32, P177, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-842X.1990.tb01011.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-842X.1990.TB01011.X]
[5]  
Klaassen C., 2007, CASARETT DOULLS TOXI, P20
[6]   The impact of a misspecified random-effects distribution on the estimation and the performance of inferential procedures in generalized linear mixed models [J].
Litiere, S. ;
Alonso, A. ;
Molenberghs, G. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (16) :3125-3144
[7]  
Massart D.L., 1997, HDB CHEMOMETRICS Q A, P339
[8]  
Massart D.L., 1997, HDB CHEMOMETRICS Q A, P23
[9]  
Massart D.L., 1997, HDB CHEMOMETRICS Q B, P47
[10]  
Moshonov H., BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE