LARGE CARDINALS BEYOND CHOICE

被引:15
作者
Bagaria, Joan [1 ]
Koellner, Peter [2 ]
Hughwoodin, W. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] ICREA, Passeig Lluis Companys 23, Barcelona 08010, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Philosophy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Math, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
large cardinals; inner model theory; Ultimate-L; HOD; axiom of choice;
D O I
10.1017/bsl.2019.28
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The HOD Dichotomy Theorem states that if there is an extendible cardinal, delta, then either HOD is "close" to V (in the sense that it correctly computes successors of singular cardinals greater than delta) or HOD is "far" from V (in the sense that all regular cardinals greater than or equal to delta are measurable in HOD). The question is whether the future will lead to the first or the second side of the dichotomy. Is HOD "close" to V, or "far" from V? There is a program aimed at establishing the first alternative-the "close" side of the HOD Dichotomy. This is the program of inner model theory. In recent years the third author has provided evidence that there is an ultimate inner model-Ultimate-L-and he has isolated a natural conjecture associated with the model-the Ultimate-L Conjecture. This conjecture implies that (assuming the existence of an extendible cardinal) that the first alternative holds-HOD is "close" to V. This is the future in which pattern prevails. In this paper we introduce a very different program, one aimed at establishing the second alternative-the "far" side of the HOD Dichotomy. This is the program of large cardinals beyond choice. Kunen famously showed that if AC holds then there cannot be a Reinhardt cardinal. It has remained open whether Reinhardt cardinals are consistent in ZF alone. It turns out that there is an entire hierarchy of choiceless large cardinals of which Reinhardt cardinals are only the beginning, and, surprisingly, this hierarchy appears to be highly ordered and amenable to systematic investigation, as we shall show in this paper. The point is that if these choiceless large cardinals are consistent then the Ultimate-L Conjecture must fail. This is the future where chaos prevails.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 318
页数:36
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [2] Cummings J., 2010, HDB SET THEORY, P775
  • [3] Devlin K.I., 1975, ISILC Logic Conference, P115
  • [4] Goldberg G., 2017, CONSISTENCY ST UNPUB
  • [5] Restrictions on forcings that change cofinalities
    Hayut, Yair
    Karagila, Asaf
    [J]. ARCHIVE FOR MATHEMATICAL LOGIC, 2016, 55 (3-4) : 373 - 384
  • [6] Kanamori A., 2009, THE HIGHER INFINITE
  • [7] ELEMENTARY EMBEDDINGS AND INFINITARY COMBINATORICS
    KUNEN, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC, 1971, 36 (03) : 407 - &
  • [8] Reinhardt W., 1967, THESIS
  • [9] Woodin W., 2011, Lecture Notes in Logic, P13
  • [10] Woodin W. H., 2014, INFINITY COMPUTABILI, P309