APPLICATIONS OF FUZZY MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: A STATE-OF-THE-ART SURVEY

被引:24
作者
Wen, Zhi [1 ]
Liao, Huchang [1 ]
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [2 ]
Antuchevicienc, Jurgita [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Inst Sustainable Construct, Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Construct Management & Real Estate, Vilnius, Lithuania
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
civil engineering; multiple criteria decision making; fuzzy set; fuzzy multiple criteria decision making; literature review; LINGUISTIC TERM SETS; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; MODEL; SELECTION; MULTICRITERIA; AHP; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3846/jcem.2021.15252
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A variety of fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) models have been proposed to solve complicated decision-making problems. Many applications have been achieved, especially in the field of civil engineering. To analyze the developments about the fuzzy MCDM methods and their applications in civil engineering in recent years and further explore the future research directions, this study conducts a state of the art survey in which 52 journal papers focusing on the applications of fuzzy MCDM models in civil engineering from 2016 to 2020 are reviewed. We respectively classify these articles according to research problems and research methods. Through the literature review, we get findings in terms of the most concerned decision-making problem, the most widely-used evaluation criterion and the most popular fuzzy MCDM model. Furthermore, we present four aspects of research challenges and corresponding future research directions in the field of civil engineering, which may be helpful for researchers and practitioners to further investigate.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 371
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Abdel-malak F.F., 2017, BENI-SUEF U J BASIC, V6, P326, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.BJBAS.2017.05.004
  • [2] Methods for Selection of Construction Project Manager: Case Study
    Afshari, Ali Reza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 143 (12)
  • [3] Selecting Building Designs with Consideration of Sustainability and Resiliency
    Amini, M.
    Zhang, B.
    Chang, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 24 (01)
  • [4] Risk assessment of bridges under multiple hazards in operation period
    Andric, Jelena M.
    Lu, Da-Gang
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2016, 83 : 80 - 92
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, Symbolic Neutrosophic Theory
  • [6] BELLMAN RE, 1970, MANAGE SCI B-APPL, V17, pB141
  • [7] Optimal Location Selection of Temporary Accommodation Sites in Iran via a Hybrid Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Boostani, Abtin
    Jolai, Fariborz
    Bozorgi-Amiri, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 144 (04)
  • [8] Applying supplier selection methodologies in a multi-stakeholder environment: A case study and a critical assessment
    Bruno, Giuseppe
    Esposito, Emilio
    Genovese, Andrea
    Simpson, Mike
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2016, 43 : 271 - 285
  • [9] A Hybrid MCDM Technique for Risk Management in Construction Projects
    Chatterjee, Kajal
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Tamosaitiene, Jolanta
    Adhikary, Krishnendu
    Kar, Samarjit
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2018, 10 (02):
  • [10] BIM-aided variable fuzzy multi-criteria decision making of low-carbon building measures selection
    Chen, L.
    Pan, W.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 27 : 222 - 232