Novel Gerota-edge-sling technique facilitates retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparative study

被引:0
作者
Chen, Wei [1 ]
Fang, Qixiang [1 ]
Ren, Haomin [2 ]
Ma, Lei [2 ]
Zeng, Jin [1 ]
Ding, Shangshu [3 ]
Wu, Dapeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Shaanxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
Kidney neoplasms; Partial nephrectomy; Robotic surgical procedures; Retroperitoneal approach; Surgical technique; ADHERENT PERINEPHRIC FAT; TRANSPERITONEAL; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-022-01079-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy is markedly restricted by limited space and visual field. We introduced a novel Gerota-edge-sling (GES) technique with self-designed traction devices to overcome these defects by attaching Gerota fascia to abdominal wall, and comparatively evaluated its utilization with routine technique. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for consecutive patients who underwent routine (control group) or GES assisted (GES group) retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors in our hospital between March 2018 and June 2020. Clinical data of perioperative outcomes and complications were collected and compared. Comparison of outcomes between anterior versus posterior tumor subgroups was also conducted. Linear regression analysis was used to define the relationship between dissection time and perinephric fat status in each group. Results Totally 103 patients were included, 48 in control and 55 in GES group respectively. All the procedures were completed successfully without conversion or positive surgical margin. GES group had significantly decreased console time (91 +/- 36 min vs. 117 +/- 41 min, p < 0.01) and dissection time (67 +/- 35 min vs. 93 +/- 38 min, p < 0.01) than control, while ischemia time, blood loss, and nephrometry score comparable between them. No major postoperative complications occurred. Dissection time of GES group was notably shorter than that of control in both anterior/posterior subgroups. Only in control group, dissection time was positively associated with perinephric fat status. Conclusions The GES technique acting as an adjunct to robotic arms with space-sparing feature, notably improves surgical exposure and facilitates dissection in retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy, while having great feasibility, efficacy and safety.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Retroperitoneal vs Transperitoneal Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison in a Multi-institutional Setting [J].
Arora, Sohrab ;
Heulitt, Gerald ;
Menon, Mani ;
Jeong, Wooju ;
Ahlawat, Rajesh K. ;
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Moon, Daniel A. ;
Maes, Kris K. ;
Rawal, Sudhir ;
Mottrie, Alexander ;
Bhandari, Mahendra ;
Rogers, Craig G. ;
Porter, James R. .
UROLOGY, 2018, 120 :131-137
[32]   Multi-institutional feasibility and safety outcomes of retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in morbidly obese patients [J].
Stout, Thomas Edward ;
McElree, Ian Mitchell ;
Smith, Aaron Christopher ;
Rac, Goran ;
Patel, Hiten ;
Gupta, Gopal ;
Gellhaus, Paul Thomas .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2023, 12 (05) :700-+
[33]   Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Shrivastava, Nikita ;
Bhargava, Priyank ;
Sharma, Gopal ;
Choudhary, Gautam Ram .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
[34]   A Comparative Cost Analysis of Robot-Assisted Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy [J].
Hyams, Elias ;
Pierorazio, Philip ;
Mullins, Jeffrey K. ;
Ward, Maryann ;
Allaf, Mohamad .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (07) :843-847
[35]   Early surgical outcomes and oncological results of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre study [J].
Veeratterapillay, Rajan ;
Addla, Sanjai K. ;
Jelley, Clare ;
Bailie, John ;
Rix, David ;
Bromage, Steve ;
Oakley, Neil ;
Weston, Robin ;
Soomro, Naeem A. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (04) :550-555
[36]   Virtual Surgical Planning: A Novel Aid to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy [J].
Lasser, Michael S. ;
Doscher, Matthew ;
Keehn, Aryeh ;
Chernyak, Victoria ;
Garfein, Evan ;
Ghavamian, Reza .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (10) :1372-1379
[37]   Comparison of AirSeal versus conventional insufflation system for retroperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Wei, Mengchao ;
Yang, Wenjie ;
Zhou, Jingmin ;
Ye, Zixing ;
Ji, Zhigang ;
Dong, Jie ;
Xu, Weifeng .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
[38]   Transforming hostile abdomen management: the rise of single-port for retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy [J].
Mottaran, Angelo ;
Piramide, Federico ;
Dell'oglio, Paolo ;
Bravi, Carlo A. ;
Paciotti, Marco ;
Source, Gabriele ;
Lambert, Edward ;
Wurnschimmel, Christoph ;
Wenzel, Mike ;
Liakos, Nikolaos ;
Turri, Filippo ;
De Groote, Ruben ;
Andras, Iulia .
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2025, 77 (03) :438-440
[39]   A Hemostatic Technique in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy and Its Impact on Renal Function [J].
Raghavan, Deepak ;
Thangarasu, Mathisekaran ;
Prakash, Sanjay J. ;
Paul, Rajesh ;
Selvaraj, Nivash .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (05)
[40]   Simplified robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: step-by-step technique and perioperative outcomes [J].
Benjamin Pradere ;
Benoit Peyronnet ;
Zine-eddine Khene ;
Romain Mathieu ;
Gregory Verhoest ;
Karim Bensalah .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2019, 13 :245-251