Novel Gerota-edge-sling technique facilitates retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparative study

被引:0
作者
Chen, Wei [1 ]
Fang, Qixiang [1 ]
Ren, Haomin [2 ]
Ma, Lei [2 ]
Zeng, Jin [1 ]
Ding, Shangshu [3 ]
Wu, Dapeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian 710061, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Shaanxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
Kidney neoplasms; Partial nephrectomy; Robotic surgical procedures; Retroperitoneal approach; Surgical technique; ADHERENT PERINEPHRIC FAT; TRANSPERITONEAL; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-022-01079-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy is markedly restricted by limited space and visual field. We introduced a novel Gerota-edge-sling (GES) technique with self-designed traction devices to overcome these defects by attaching Gerota fascia to abdominal wall, and comparatively evaluated its utilization with routine technique. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for consecutive patients who underwent routine (control group) or GES assisted (GES group) retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors in our hospital between March 2018 and June 2020. Clinical data of perioperative outcomes and complications were collected and compared. Comparison of outcomes between anterior versus posterior tumor subgroups was also conducted. Linear regression analysis was used to define the relationship between dissection time and perinephric fat status in each group. Results Totally 103 patients were included, 48 in control and 55 in GES group respectively. All the procedures were completed successfully without conversion or positive surgical margin. GES group had significantly decreased console time (91 +/- 36 min vs. 117 +/- 41 min, p < 0.01) and dissection time (67 +/- 35 min vs. 93 +/- 38 min, p < 0.01) than control, while ischemia time, blood loss, and nephrometry score comparable between them. No major postoperative complications occurred. Dissection time of GES group was notably shorter than that of control in both anterior/posterior subgroups. Only in control group, dissection time was positively associated with perinephric fat status. Conclusions The GES technique acting as an adjunct to robotic arms with space-sparing feature, notably improves surgical exposure and facilitates dissection in retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy, while having great feasibility, efficacy and safety.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Retroperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for posterior located renal tumours: Technique and early term outcomes [J].
Boga, Mehmet Salih ;
Ates, Mutlu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (02)
[22]   Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy utilizing a hybrid-port technique [J].
Deem S. ;
Bhavsar R. ;
Picard J. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2012, 6 (3) :243-245
[23]   Randomised controlled feasibility trial of retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: the ROPARN study [J].
Kaelble, Sebastian ;
Engelmann, Simon U. ;
Schrutz, Hannah ;
Zeman, Florian ;
Rinderknecht, Emily ;
Haas, Maximilian ;
Pickl, Christoph ;
Gossler, Christopher ;
Yang, Yushan ;
Denzinger, Stefan ;
Burger, Maximilian ;
Bruendl, Johannes ;
Mayr, Roman .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 135 (06) :977-986
[24]   Retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: still underused despite the supporting evidence [J].
Paciotti, Marco ;
Piramide, Federico ;
Bravi, Carlo A. ;
Dell'oglio, Paolo ;
Turri, Filippo ;
Di Maida, Fabrizio ;
De Groote, Ruben ;
Lambert, Edward ;
Wurnschimmel, Christoph ;
Larcher, Alessandro .
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 75 (05) :652-655
[25]   Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Approaches for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy by Tumor Locations [J].
Akagi, Naoki ;
Obayashi, Riki ;
Yamamoto, Akihiro ;
Nagoshi, Akihiko ;
Fujiwara, Tasuku ;
Igarashi, Atsushi ;
Hattori, Yuto ;
Shibasaki, Noboru ;
Kawakita, Mutsushi ;
Yamasaki, Toshinari .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2025, 18 (01)
[26]   Simplified robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: step-by-step technique and perioperative outcomes [J].
Pradere, Benjamin ;
Peyronnet, Benoit ;
Khene, Zine-eddine ;
Mathieu, Romain ;
Verhoest, Gregory ;
Bensalah, Karim .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2019, 13 (02) :245-251
[27]   Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Can retroperitoneal approach suit for renal tumors of all locations?-A large retrospective cohort study [J].
Lyu, Xiangjun ;
Jia, Zhuo ;
Ao, Liyan ;
Ren, Changhao ;
Wu, Yangyang ;
Xu, Yunlai ;
Chen, Ke ;
Gao, Yu ;
Wang, Baojun ;
Ma, Xin ;
Zhang, Xu .
BMC UROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
[28]   Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Off-Clamp Technique Editorial Comment [J].
Weizer, Alon Z. ;
Hafez, Khaled S. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) :7-8
[29]   Successful robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for giant renal hilum angiomyolipoma through the retroperitoneal approach: A case report [J].
Luo, Shu-Hang ;
Zeng, Qin-Song ;
Chen, Jun-Xing ;
Huang, Bin ;
Wang, Zong-Ren ;
Li, Wen-Ji ;
Yang, Yun ;
Chen, Ling-Wu .
WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 10 (12) :3886-3892
[30]   Comparison of the Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Approach in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in an Initial Case Series in Japan [J].
Tanaka, Kazushi ;
Shigemura, Katsumi ;
Furukawa, Junya ;
Ishimura, Takeshi ;
Muramaki, Mototsugu ;
Miyake, Hideaki ;
Fujisawa, Masato .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (11) :1384-1388