Biomechanical comparison of fixation methods in transverse patella fractures

Objective: To compare monofilament wire versus braided cable for stabilizing transverse patella fractures using the modified AO tension band technique. Design: A randomized blocked (paired) study comparing two fixation methods. Statistical analysis was performed using a nested repeated measures analysis, followed by Bonferroni post hoc testing. Methods: Seven paired embalmed knees (mean age 71.8 years, SD 14.6 years) were dissected, and transverse fractures were simulated. The knees were reduced and randomly fixed by either two parallel 0.062-inch Kirschner wires with a 1.0-millimeter-diameter 316L stainless steel monofilament wire tension loop or two Kirschner wires with a 1.0-millimeter-diameter 316L stainless steel braided cable tension loop. Knees were tested by applying a cyclic load through the suprapatellar tendon between twenty and 300 newtons for thirty cycles. Results: The maximum fracture displacement increased with each cycle of lending for both the braided cable and monofilament wire tension loop configurations (p = 0.0001). The average peak displacement at the thirtieth cycle was 2.25 millimeters for monofilament wire and 0.73 millimeters for the cable. When comparing both methods for all cycles, the braided cable allowed less fracture displacement than did the monofilament wire (p = 0.002), and the rate of increase per cycle of maximum fracture displacement was less for the cable than for the wire (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: In transverse, noncomminuted patella fractures, fixation with two Kirschner wires and a 1.0-millimeter braided cable tension loop was superior to the monofilament wire tension loop. Most importantly, the braided cable afforded more predictable results during cyclic loading.