Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management

被引:86
作者
Khan, Imran [1 ]
Zhao, Minjuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, 3 Taicheng Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Assessment of river ecosystem; Willingness to pay; Choice experiment; Mixed logit model; Multinomial logit model; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; SHIYANG RIVER; SUZHOU CREEK; FRESH-WATER; RESTORATION; STREAM; CHALLENGES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.339
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concept of ecosystem services provides a valuable approach for linking humans and nature and for supporting the protection of natural ecosystems. River water services, which influence public health and daily routines, have both social and ecological benefits to a surrounding area. However, river networks and their services have suffered extensive destruction due to urbanization and industrialization, especially in China. An assessment of river system benefits and recognition of public preferences are crucial for sustainable river management and effective river system restoration. The objective of this study was to assess a household's willingness to pay using a choice experiment (CE) with mixed logit and multinomial logit models. This technique was applied to evaluate a respondent's preferences regarding water service attributes such as upper basin, middle basin and lower basin ecological water distribution; water quality; and payment and the possible source of heterogeneity in these attributes. The estimated likelihood ratio test demonstrated that random parameter logit model (RPL) models had considerably more explanatory power than multinomial logit (MNL) models. It was also revealed that the RPL-II model was the most powerful among all the models, demonstrating the capability of that model to predict the choices of the respondents. Furthermore, the findings show that water quality was the most preferred river attribute, and households were willing to pay more for the water quality attribute that derives the highest marginal value. Household income level, residential location, education level, and sex were the main factors influencing willingness to pay. These assessments provide guidance, policy recommendations and a reference for researchers and policy makers to improve and enhance current river water services in the future. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 831
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An academic analysis with recommendations for water management and planning at the basin scale: A review of water planning in the Segura River Basin
    Aldaya, Maite M.
    Custodio, Emilio
    Llamas, Ramon
    Feliciana Fernandez, Maria
    Garcia, Jesus
    Angel Rodenas, Miguel
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 662 : 755 - 768
  • [42] Price Sensitivity of Farmer Preferences for Irrigation Water-Pricing Method: Evidence from a Choice Model Analysis in Krishna River Basin, India
    Veettil, Prakashan Chellattan
    Speelman, Stijn
    Frija, Aymen
    Buysse, Jeroen
    Mondelaers, Koen
    van Huylenbroeck, Guido
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2011, 137 (02): : 205 - 214
  • [43] Hydrologic Trends in the Upper Nueces River Basin of Texas-Implications for Water Resource Management and Ecological Health
    Thomas, E. Dave
    Venkataraman, Kartik
    Chraibi, Victoria
    Kannan, Narayanan
    HYDROLOGY, 2019, 6 (01)
  • [44] Hydrological effects of water management measures in the Dovine River basin, Lithuania
    Querner, Erik P.
    Povilaitis, Arvydas
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2009, 54 (02): : 363 - 374
  • [45] Assessing Water Management Strategies under Water Scarcity in the Mexican Portion of the Colorado River Basin
    Hernandez-Cruz, Astrid
    Sandoval-Solis, Samuel
    Mendoza-Espinosa, Leopoldo G.
    Ramirez-Hernandez, Jorge
    Medellin-Azuara, Josue
    Daessle, Luis W.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 149 (09)
  • [46] Ecosystem Services Insights into Water Resources Management in China: A Case of Xi'an City
    Liu, Jingya
    Li, Jing
    Gao, Ziyi
    Yang, Min
    Qin, Keyu
    Yang, Xiaonan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (12):
  • [47] Integrated modelling and management of water resources: the ecosystem perspective on the nexus approach
    Huelsmann, Stephan
    Susnik, Janez
    Rinke, Karsten
    Langan, Simon
    van Wijk, Dianneke
    Janssen, Annette B. G.
    Mooij, Wolf M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 40 : 14 - 20
  • [48] Integrated valuation of ecosystem services obtained from restoring water to the environment in a major regulated river basin
    Bark, Rosalind H.
    Colloff, Matthew J.
    MacDonald, Darla Hatton
    Pollino, Carmel A.
    Jackson, Sue
    Crossman, Neville D.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 : 381 - 391
  • [49] Oasis evolution and water resource utilization of a typical area in the inland river basin of an arid area: a case study of the Manas River valley
    Zhang, Qingqing
    Xu, Hailiang
    Li, Yan
    Fan, Zili
    Zhang, Peng
    Yu, Pujia
    Ling, Hongbo
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2012, 66 (02) : 683 - 692
  • [50] Regional water quality management for the Karun-Dez River basin, Iran
    Afkhami, Mehran
    Shariat, Mahmood
    Jaafarzadeh, Nemat
    Ghadiri, Hossein
    Nabizadeh, Ramin
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 21 (03) : 192 - 199