Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management

被引:86
作者
Khan, Imran [1 ]
Zhao, Minjuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Econ & Management, 3 Taicheng Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Assessment of river ecosystem; Willingness to pay; Choice experiment; Mixed logit model; Multinomial logit model; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; CONTINGENT VALUATION; SHIYANG RIVER; SUZHOU CREEK; FRESH-WATER; RESTORATION; STREAM; CHALLENGES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.339
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concept of ecosystem services provides a valuable approach for linking humans and nature and for supporting the protection of natural ecosystems. River water services, which influence public health and daily routines, have both social and ecological benefits to a surrounding area. However, river networks and their services have suffered extensive destruction due to urbanization and industrialization, especially in China. An assessment of river system benefits and recognition of public preferences are crucial for sustainable river management and effective river system restoration. The objective of this study was to assess a household's willingness to pay using a choice experiment (CE) with mixed logit and multinomial logit models. This technique was applied to evaluate a respondent's preferences regarding water service attributes such as upper basin, middle basin and lower basin ecological water distribution; water quality; and payment and the possible source of heterogeneity in these attributes. The estimated likelihood ratio test demonstrated that random parameter logit model (RPL) models had considerably more explanatory power than multinomial logit (MNL) models. It was also revealed that the RPL-II model was the most powerful among all the models, demonstrating the capability of that model to predict the choices of the respondents. Furthermore, the findings show that water quality was the most preferred river attribute, and households were willing to pay more for the water quality attribute that derives the highest marginal value. Household income level, residential location, education level, and sex were the main factors influencing willingness to pay. These assessments provide guidance, policy recommendations and a reference for researchers and policy makers to improve and enhance current river water services in the future. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 831
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Implementing environmental flows in integrated water resources management and the ecosystem approach
    Overton, I. C.
    Smith, D. M.
    Dalton, J.
    Barchiesi, S.
    Acreman, M. C.
    Stromberg, J. C.
    Kirby, J. M.
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2014, 59 (3-4) : 860 - 877
  • [32] Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators
    Shoyama, Kikuko
    Managi, Shunsuke
    Yamagata, Yoshiki
    LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 34 : 282 - 293
  • [33] Investigating the Impact of Urbanization on Water Ecosystem Services in the Dongjiang River Basin: A Spatial Analysis
    Jia, Kai
    Huang, Ailin
    Yin, Xiaoling
    Yang, Ji
    Deng, Liming
    Lin, Zhuoling
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [34] Insurance, prevention or just wait and see? Public preferences for water management strategies in the context of climate change
    Glenk, Klaus
    Fischer, Anke
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (11) : 2279 - 2291
  • [35] Megacities and rivers: Scalar mismatches between urban water management and river basin management
    van den Brandeler, Francine
    Gupta, Joyeeta
    Hordijk, Michaela
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 573 : 1067 - 1074
  • [36] Towards Intangible Freshwater Cultural Ecosystem Services: Informing Sustainable Water Resources Management
    Ncube, Sikhululekile
    Beevers, Lindsay
    Momblanch, Andrea
    WATER, 2021, 13 (04)
  • [37] Estimating the non-market benefits of climate change adaptation of river ecosystem services: A choice experiment application in the Aoos basin, Greece
    Andreopoulos, Dimitrios
    Damigos, Dimitrios
    Comiti, Francesco
    Fischer, Christian
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 45 : 92 - 103
  • [38] How to Prioritize the Attributes of Water Ecosystem Service for Water Security Management: Choice Experiments versus Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Arellanos, Erick
    Guzman, Wagner
    Garcia, Ligia
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [39] Is there public desire for a federal takeover of water resource management in Australia?
    Wheeler, Sarah Ann
    Owens, Katherine
    Zuo, Alec
    WATER RESEARCH, 2024, 248
  • [40] Trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in Inland River Basins under the influence of ecological water transfer project: A case study on the Tarim River basin
    Qian, Kaixuan
    Ma, Xiaofei
    Yan, Wei
    Li, Jiaxin
    Xu, Shixian
    Liu, Yuan
    Luo, Chun
    Yu, Wei
    Yu, Xiaotong
    Wang, Yahui
    Zhou, Limin
    Wang, Yonghui
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 908