Transformation zone sampling rate is a useful performance indicator for practitioners collecting cervical samples using SurePathTM liquid-based cytology system

被引:6
作者
Narine, N.
Young, W.
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Manchester M13 9WW, Lancs, England
[2] Qual Assurance Reference Ctr, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
cervical cytology; liquid-based cytology; transformation zone; performance indicator; professional development; cervical screening; cytology; cytodiagnosis; sample adequacy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00454.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
An analysis of the reports of 53 982 liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples processed at the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, reveals a significant relationship between the transformation zone (TZ) sampling rate observed in specimens submitted from different practices and their overall detection rate for dyskaryosis. The observed correlation (R = 0.184; P = 0.033, CI = 0.017 to 0.397) is very similar to that described previously using conventional cervical smears and confirms the potential relevance of TZ sampling rates as an indicator of consistently effective specimen collection. The correlation between unsatisfactory sample rates and detection rates for high-grade dyskaryosis ( R = -0.188, P = 0.030, CI = -0.865 to -0.045) also shows a significant relationship for LBC samples which was not previously seen in conventional smears. The essential role of smear taker feedback, the use of transformation zone sampling and unsatisfactory smear rates as key indicators and the practical issues relating to routine reporting of transformation zone components are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 224
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Agenda for Change Project Team, 2004, NHS KNOWL SKILLS FRA
[2]   Survey of smear taking practice in the former North Thames region [J].
Al Awadhi, R ;
Coleman, DV .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2000, 11 (06) :488-495
[3]   Sampling, sampling errors and specimen preparation [J].
Baandrup, U ;
Bishop, JW ;
Bonfiglio, TA ;
Branca, M ;
Hutchinson, ML ;
Laverty, CR ;
Ahmad, J ;
Illescas, LT ;
Obwegeser, JH ;
Patnick, J ;
Pogacnik, A ;
Rosenthal, DL ;
Suprun, HZ ;
Verhest, A ;
Richart, RM .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2000, 44 (06) :944-948
[4]  
BAKER RM, 1989, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V39, P109
[5]  
Coomarasamy A, 2001, Health Info Libr J, V18, P183, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2532.2001.00349.x
[6]   Characteristics and quality of Papanicolaou smears obtained by primary care clinicians using a single commercial laboratory [J].
Curtis, P ;
Mintzer, M ;
Morrell, D ;
Resnick, AC ;
Hendrix, S ;
Qaqish, BF .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1999, 8 (05) :407-413
[7]  
*GEN MED SERV CONT, 2006, QUAL OUTC FRAM GUID
[8]  
LOVATT H, 2001, JOURNEY REFLECTION A
[9]   Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy - IAC task force summary [J].
McGoogan, E ;
Colgan, TJ ;
Ramzy, I ;
Cochand-Priollet, B ;
Davey, DD ;
Grohs, HK ;
Gurley, AM ;
Husain, OAN ;
Hutchinson, ML ;
Knesel, EA ;
Linder, J ;
Mango, LJ ;
Mitchell, H ;
Peebles, A ;
Reith, A ;
Robinowitz, M ;
Sauer, T ;
Shida, S ;
Solomon, D ;
Topalidis, T ;
Wilbur, DC ;
Yamauchi, K .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1998, 42 (01) :25-32
[10]  
*NHSCP, 1998, RES PACK TRAIN SMEAR