Efficacy of levamisole with standard care treatment vs. standard care in clinical presentations of non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Asgardoon, Mohammad Hossein [1 ,2 ]
Koochak, Hamid Emadi [2 ]
Kazemi-Galougahi, Mohammad Hassan [3 ]
Dehnavi, Ali Zare [2 ]
Khodaei, Behzad [4 ]
Behkar, Atefeh [2 ]
Dehpour, Ahmad Reza [5 ,6 ]
Khalili, Hossein [7 ]
Aminianfar, Mohammad [8 ]
机构
[1] AJA Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[3] AJA Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Dept Social Med, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Shariati Hosp, Dept Pathol, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Expt Med Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[6] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Pharmacol, Tehran, Iran
[7] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Pharmacotherapy, Tehran, Iran
[8] AJA Univ Med Sci, Infect Dis & Trop Med Res Ctr IDTMRC, Dept Aerosp & Subaquat Med, Tehran, Iran
来源
FRONTIERS IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2022年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
COVID-19; Levamisole; Randomized Controlled Trial; SARS-CoV-2; Signs and Symptoms;
D O I
10.18502/fem.v6i3.9395
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of adding a 10-day course of levamisole (LVM) to the standard care compared with standard care alone, on the clinical status of COVID-19 patients with mild to moderate disease. Methods: In this randomized open-label trial, we enrolled non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 at nine health centers in Tehran province, Iran, in 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a 10-day course of LVM with standard care (n=185) or standard care alone (n=180) in a 1:1 ratio. On days 1 to 10, LVM was administered orally at a dosage of 50 mg. The participants were called and followed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 14. The measured parameters were general health condition, hospitalization rate, signs and symptoms, and adverse events. The generalized estimating equations model was used for analysis. Results: Among 507 randomized patients, 473 patients started the experiment and received LVM plus standard care or received the standard care alone; 385 patients included in the analysis; 346 (98%) patients completed the trial. The median age of the patients was 40 years [IQR: 32-50.75]; and 201 (55.1%) patiens were male. The mean age, sex ratio, and frequency of the underlying diseases of the patients in the two study groups had no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). Compared to the control group, LVM improved the general health condition of the patients (B=-0.635; 95% CI: -0.041,-0.329; P<0.001). Patients receiving LVM compared with standard care group had significantly lower odds of developing fever (OR=0.260; 95% CI: 0.113,0.599; P=0.002), chills (OR=0.223; 95% CI: 0.076,0.648; P=0.006), fatigue (OR=0.576; 95% CI: 0.346,0.960; P=0.034), and myalgia (OR=0.544; 95% CI: 0.317,0.932; P=0.027). No significant difference was observed in the rate of hospitalization. Although the intervention group had greater adverse effects than the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Findings of this study suggest that LVM has clinical benefits in improving patients' health condition with mild to moderate COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Plain Language vs Standard Format for Youth Understanding of COVID-19 Recommendations A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Stallwood, Lisa
    Sammy, Adrian
    Prebeg, Matthew
    Relihan, Jacqueline
    Baba, Ami
    Charide, Rana
    Sayfi, Shahab
    Elliott, Sarah A.
    Hartling, Lisa
    Munan, Matthew
    Richards, Dawn P.
    Mathew, Joseph L.
    Kredo, Tamara
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Motilall, Ashley
    Scott, Shannon D.
    Klugar, Miloslav
    Lotfi, Tamara
    Stevens, Adrienne L.
    Pottie, Kevin
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Butcher, Nancy J.
    Offringa, Martin
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2023, 177 (09) : 956 - 965
  • [42] Tocilizumab in combination with standard of care in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: Efficacy and safety from a phase 3 clinical trial in Japan
    Mori, Nobuyoshi
    Nanki, Toshihiro
    Hirakawa, Akihiro
    Yamato, Masaya
    Kaneko, Yuko
    Shiokawa, Rie
    Ozaki, Ryoto
    Kawabata, Norihiro
    Ohmagari, Norio
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [43] Hydroxychloroquine for Non-Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Lucchetta, Rosa
    Matuoka, Jessica Y.
    de Oliveira Junior, Haliton Alves
    Oliveira, Gustavo
    Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi
    Azevedo, Luciano
    Berwanger, Otavio
    Lopes, Renato Delascio
    Rosa, Regis Goulart
    Veiga, Viviane Cordeiro
    Avezum, Alvaro
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 120 (04)
  • [44] Safety and Efficacy of Selenium on Recovery of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Shafiei, Elham
    Mahmoudvand, Golnaz
    Rouzbahani, Arian Karimi
    Nazari, Ali
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 18 (04):
  • [45] Antiviral and clinical activity of bamlanivimab in a randomized trial of non-hospitalized adults with COVID-19 (vol 13, 4931, 2022)
    Chew, Kara W.
    Moser, Carlee S.
    Daar, Eric S. A.
    Wohl, David A. Z.
    Li, Jonathan Z. W.
    Coombs, Robert W.
    Ritz, Justin
    Giganti, Mark
    Javan, Arzhang Cyrus
    Li, Yijia C.
    Choudhary, Manish C.
    Deo, Rinki
    Malvestutto, Carlos
    Klekotka, Paul
    Price, Karen
    Nirula, Ajay
    Fischer, William
    Bala, Veenu M.
    Ribeiro, Ruy M. S.
    Perelson, Alan S. V.
    Fletcher, Courtney V. J.
    Eron, Joseph J. S.
    Currier, Judith S. D.
    Hughes, Michael D. M.
    Smith, Davey M.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [46] COVID-19 treatments approved in the European Union and clinical recommendations for the management of non-hospitalized and hospitalized patients
    Bellino, Stefania
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2022, 54 (01) : 2856 - 2860
  • [47] Effect of Colchicine vs Usual Care Alone on Intubation and 28-Day Mortality in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Diaz, Rafael
    Orlandini, Andres
    Castellana, Noelia
    Caccavo, Alberto
    Corral, Pablo
    Corral, Gonzalo
    Chacon, Carolina
    Lamelas, Pablo
    Botto, Fernando
    Luz Diaz, Maria
    Manuel Dominguez, Juan
    Pascual, Andrea
    Rovito, Carla
    Galatte, Agustina
    Scarafia, Franco
    Sued, Omar
    Gutierrez, Omar
    Jolly, Sanjit S.
    Miro, Jose M.
    Eikelboom, John
    Loeb, Mark
    Maggioni, Aldo Pietro
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Yusuf, Salim
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (12)
  • [48] Remote Postdischarge Treatment of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction by Allied Health Care Practitioners vs Standard Care The IMMACULATE Randomized Clinical Trial
    Chan, Mark Y.
    Koh, Karen W. L.
    Poh, Sock-Cheng
    Marchesseau, Stephanie
    Singh, Devinder
    Han, Yiying
    Ng, Faclin
    Lim, Eleanor
    Prabath, Joseph F.
    Lee, Chi-Hang
    Sim, Hui-Wen
    Chen, Ruth
    Carvalho, Leonardo
    Tan, Sock-Hwee
    Loh, Joshua P. Y.
    Tan, Jack W. C.
    Kuwelker, Karishma
    Amanullah, R. M.
    Chin, Chee-Tang
    Yip, James W. L.
    Lee, Choy-Yee
    Gan, Juvena
    Lo, Chew-Yong
    Ho, Hee-Hwa
    Hausenloy, Derek J.
    Tai, Bee-Choo
    Richards, A. Mark
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6 (07) : 830 - 835
  • [49] Acupuncture or cupping plus standard care versus standard care in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients: An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial
    Alipour, Reihane
    Jamalimoghadamsiahkali, Saeidreza
    Karimi, Mehrdad
    Asadi, Asma
    Ghaem, Haleh
    Adel-Mehraban, Mohammad Sadegh
    Kazemi, Amir Hooman
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (04)
  • [50] Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab versus standard care/placebo in patients with COVID-19; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Vela, Driton
    Vela-Gaxha, Zana
    Rexhepi, Mjellma
    Olloni, Rozafa
    Hyseni, Violeta
    Nallbani, Rajmonda
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 88 (05) : 1955 - 1963