Intracoronary pressure increase due to contrast injection for optical coherence tomography imaging

被引:3
|
作者
Shimamura, Kunihiro [1 ]
Kubo, Takashi [1 ]
Ino, Yasushi [1 ]
Shiono, Yasutsugu [1 ]
Matsuo, Yoshiki [1 ]
Kitabata, Hironori [1 ]
Terada, Kosei [1 ]
Emori, Hiroki [1 ]
Katayama, Yosuke [1 ]
Khalifa, Amir Kh M. [1 ]
Takahata, Masahiro [1 ]
Wada, Teruaki [1 ]
Higashioka, Daisuke [1 ]
Kashiwagi, Manabu [1 ]
Kuroi, Akio [1 ]
Tanaka, Atsushi [1 ]
Hozumi, Takeshi [1 ]
Akasaka, Takashi [1 ]
机构
[1] Wakayama Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 6418509, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Angiography; Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve; Optical coherence tomography; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; TRIAL; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.08.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) requires intracoronary injection of contrast media to remove blood from the field of view during image acquisition. Contrast injection may cause a temporal increase in intracoronary pressure. The aim of this study was to compare the intracoronary pressure during contrast injection between OCT and coronary angiography. Methods: We measured intracoronary pressure by using a pressure guidewire during contrast injection for OCT and angiography in 30 coronary arteries (mean fractional flow reserve = 0.90 +/- 0.03). Contrast media was injected into coronary artery through the guiding catheter by using a mechanical injector pump. Results: Intracoronary pressure before contrast injection was similar between OCT and angiography (systolic pressure: 123 +/- 18 mmHg vs. 122 +/- 19mmHg, p = 0.863). Intracoronary pressure was increased due to contrast injection in both OCT (systolic pressure: 123 +/- 18mmHg to 132 +/- 18mmHg, p< 0.001) and angiography (systolic pressure: 122 +/- 19mmHg to 128 +/- 19mmHg, p< 0.001). The increase in intracoronary pressure was slightly greater in OCT compared with angiography (absolute increase of systolic pressure: 9 +/- 2mmHg vs. 6 +/- 1 mmHg, p< 0.001; and relative increase of systolic pressure: 8 +/- 2% vs. 5 +/- 1%, p< 0.001). Intracoronary pressure during contrast injection was not significantly different between OCT and angiography (systolic pressure: 132 +/- 18 mm Hg vs. 128 +/- 19mmHg, p = 0.831). Conclusions: Contrast injection for OCT induced significant but small increase in intracoronary pressure compared with that for angiography. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Japanese College of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 301
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-contrast imaging of human posterior eye by Jones matrix optical coherence tomography
    Yasuno, Yoshiaki
    BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND SENSING CONFERENCE, 2017, 10251
  • [42] Assessing the efficacy of saline flush in frequency-domain optical coherence tomography for intracoronary imaging
    Masahiro Kimura
    Teruki Takeda
    Yasushi Tsujino
    Yuichi Matsumoto
    Masayuki Yamaji
    Tomoko Sakaguchi
    Keiko Maeda
    Hiroshi Mabuchi
    Tomoyuki Murakami
    Heart and Vessels, 2024, 39 : 310 - 318
  • [43] Semiautomatic segmentation and quantification of calcified plaques in intracoronary optical coherence tomography images
    Wang, Zhao
    Kyono, Hiroyuki
    Bezerra, Hiram G.
    Wang, Hui
    Gargesha, Madhusudhana
    Alraies, Chadi
    Xu, Chenyang
    Schmitt, Joseph M.
    Wilson, David L.
    Costa, Marco A.
    Rollins, Andrew M.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2010, 15 (06)
  • [44] Single cardiac cycle three-dimensional intracoronary optical coherence tomography
    Kim, Tae Shik
    Park, Hyun-Sang
    Jang, Sun-Joo
    Song, Joon Woo
    Cho, Han Saem
    Kim, Sunwon
    Bouma, Brett E.
    Kim, Jin Won
    Oh, Wang-Yuhl
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2016, 7 (12): : 4847 - 4858
  • [45] Optimizing flushing parameters in intracoronary optical coherence tomography: an in vivo swine study
    Suter, Melissa J.
    Kashiwagi, Manabu
    Gallagher, Kevin A.
    Nadkarni, Seemantini K.
    Asanani, Nayan
    Tanaka, Atsushi
    Conditt, Gerard B.
    Tellez, Armando
    Milewski, Krzysztof
    Kaluza, Greg L.
    Granada, Juan F.
    Bouma, Brett E.
    Tearney, Guillermo J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2015, 31 (06) : 1097 - 1106
  • [46] Artificial intelligence for the analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography images: a systematic review
    van der Waerden, Ruben G. A.
    Volleberg, Rick H. J. A.
    Luttikholt, Thijs J.
    Cancian, Pierandrea
    van der Zande, Joske L.
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Holm, Niels R.
    Kedhi, Elvin
    Escaned, Javier
    Pellegrini, Dario
    Guagliumi, Giulio
    Mehta, Shamir R.
    Pinilla-Echeverri, Natalia
    Moreno, Raul
    Raber, Lorenz
    Roleder, Tomasz
    van Ginneken, Bram
    Sanchez, Clara, I
    Isgum, Ivana
    van Royen, Niels
    Thannhauser, Jos
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH, 2025, 6 (02): : 270 - 284
  • [47] Polypyrrole Nanoparticles: A Potential Optical Coherence Tomography Contrast Agent for Cancer Imaging
    Au, Kin Man
    Lu, Zenghai
    Matcher, Stephen J.
    Armes, Steven P.
    ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2011, 23 (48) : 5792 - +
  • [48] Dynamic optical coherence tomography imaging of the lacrimal passage with an extrinsic contrast agent
    Yoshimura, Reiko
    Choi, Dong-Hak
    Fujimoto, Masahiro
    Uji, Akihito
    Hiwatashi, Fumiko
    Ohbayashi, Kohji
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2019, 10 (03) : 1482 - 1495
  • [49] Optical coherence tomography imaging of microfluidic pattern with different refractive index contrast
    Hu, Zhixiong
    Hao, Bingtao
    Liu, Wenli
    Hong, Baoyu
    OPTICS IN HEALTH CARE AND BIOMEDICAL OPTICS VI, 2014, 9268
  • [50] Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography: Experience and Indications for Clinical Use
    Ghione M.
    Kýlýçkesmez K.
    Zivelonghi C.
    Estevez Loureiro R.
    Foin N.
    Mattesini A.
    Secco G.G.
    Dall'Ara G.
    Rama-Merchan J.C.
    de Silva R.
    Di Mario C.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, 2013, 6 (5) : 399 - 410