Extending the Evaluation of Social Assistive Robots With Accessibility Indicators: The AUSUS Evaluation Framework

被引:3
作者
Iglesias, Ana [1 ]
Garcia, Javier [1 ]
Garcia-Olaya, Angel [1 ]
Fuentetaja, Raquel [1 ]
Fernandez, Fernando [1 ]
Romero-Garces, Adrian [2 ]
Marfil, Rebeca [2 ]
Bandera, Antonio [2 ]
Ting, Karine Lan Hing [3 ]
Voilmy, Dimitri [3 ]
Duenas, Alvaro [4 ]
Suarez-Mejias, Cristina [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Comp Sci & Engn Dept, Leganes 28911, Spain
[2] Univ Malaga, Dept Elect Technol, Malaga 29016, Spain
[3] Univ Technol Troyes, F-10300 Troyes, France
[4] Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio, Seville 41013, Spain
关键词
Robots; Usability; Software; Guidelines; User experience; Service robots; Faces; Human-robot interaction; robotics and automation; robots; service robots; systems; man; and cybernetics; HEALTH-CARE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1109/THMS.2021.3112976
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The introduction of robots in the real world requires previous evaluation of the envisaged performance. Factors like usability, user experience, social acceptance, or societal impact, among others, have been taken into account in evaluation frameworks defined during the last years. However, one of the most important factors that need to be evaluated in any kind of interaction is whether all the users are able to work with the system with the same opportunities and easiness, and none of the current human-robot interaction (HRI) evaluation frameworks include this factor yet. This article proposes an extension of a popular HRI evaluation framework, including accessibility as a new evaluation factor. The proposed approach, named AUSUS, considers Accessibility, Usability, Social acceptance, User experience, and Societal impact. This article presents a use case of the framework, which is evaluated through a socially assistive robotic platform created to perform comprehensive geriatric assessment: the CLARC system. The details of the evaluation process in a hospital and a retirement home are reported, and the main difficulties and recommendations of using AUSUS are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 612
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Moving towards inclusive design guidelines for socially and ethically aware HCI [J].
Abascal, J ;
Nicolle, C .
INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2005, 17 (05) :484-505
[2]  
Al-Qbilat M., 2021, ELECTRONICS, V10, P561
[3]  
Allen I.E., 2007, QUAL PROG, V40, P64
[4]  
Bannon Liam, 2011, Interactions, V18, P50, DOI 10.1145/1978822.1978833
[5]  
Baztan Juan J., 1993, Revista Espanola de Geriatria y Gerontologia, V28, P32
[6]   A unified methodology for the evaluation of accessibility and usability of mobile applications [J].
Billi, Marco ;
Burzagli, Laura ;
Catarci, Tiziana ;
Santucci, Giuseppe ;
Bertini, Enrico ;
Gabbanini, Francesco ;
Palchetti, Enrico .
UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2010, 9 (04) :337-356
[7]   Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness [J].
Giorgio Brajnik .
Universal Access in the Information Society, 2004, 3 (3-4) :252-263
[8]  
Brajnik G, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5176, P63, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-85200-1_9
[9]   What is a participatory design result? [J].
Bratteteig, Tone ;
Wagner, Ina .
PARTICIPATORY DESIGN IN AN ERA OF PARTICIPATION (PDC 2016), VOL 1, 2016, :141-150
[10]  
Broekens Joost, 2009, Gerontechnology, V8, P94, DOI 10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00