Intergovernmental cooperation networks, national policy positions and partisan ideologies: longitudinal evidence from the Council of the European Union

被引:14
作者
Huhe, Narisong [1 ]
Thomson, Robert [2 ]
Arregui, Javier [3 ]
Naurin, Daniel [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Sch Govt & Publ Policy, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Social Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept Polit Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Oslo, ARENA Ctr European Studies, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Polit Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Networks; Council; ideology; populism; INFORMATION; INSTITUTIONS; PREFERENCES; EXCHANGE;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2021.1991980
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This study describes and explains the evolution of cooperation networks among member states in the European Union. We examine the effects of similarities between states in their policy positions on specific controversial issues, the ideological orientations of their national governments, and the presence of populist parties in national governments. This builds on a prominent explanation of political ties, according to which political actors who share similar characteristics are likely to cooperate. The analysis examines cooperation networks in the Committee of Permanent Representatives (Coreper I), one of the highest-level committees in the Council, in the period 2003-2018. The findings indicate that states with similar policy positions on specific controversial issues tend to form cooperative relationships, while party ideology indirectly and relatively weakly affects the formation of ties. Surprisingly, the presence of populist parties is unrelated to network evolution. These findings have implications for the extent to which cooperation in the Council is shaped by national democratic processes.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 96
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
AUSTENSMITH D, 1992, SOC CHOICE WELFARE, V9, P229
[2]   INFORMATION AND INFLUENCE - LOBBYING FOR AGENDAS AND VOTES [J].
AUSTENSMITH, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 37 (03) :799-833
[3]  
Bartolini S., 2001, POLITIQUE EUROPEENNE, V4, P15
[4]   The dimensionality of political space: Epistemological and methodological considerations [J].
Benoit, Kenneth ;
Laver, Michael .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2012, 13 (02) :194-218
[5]   Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries [J].
Berardo, Ramiro ;
Scholz, John T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 54 (03) :632-649
[6]   Eurosceptics in the European Parliament: Exit or Voice? [J].
Brack, Nathalie .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2012, 34 (02) :151-168
[7]   Friends, brokers, and transitivity: Who informs whom in Washington politics? [J].
Carpenter, DP ;
Esterling, KM ;
Lazer, DMJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2004, 66 (01) :224-246
[8]   Radical right parties and European economic integration: Evidence from the seventh European Parliament [J].
Cavallaro, Matteo ;
Flacher, David ;
Zanetti, Massimo Angelo .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2018, 19 (02) :321-343
[9]   SOCIAL CAPITAL IN THE CREATION OF HUMAN-CAPITAL [J].
COLEMAN, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1988, 94 :S95-S120
[10]  
Denzau A.D., 2000, Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality, P23, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511805813.002