Time-Window Approaches to Space-Weather Forecast Metrics: A solar Wind case Study

被引:26
作者
Owens, Mathew J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Space & Atmospher Elect Grp, Reading, Berks, England
来源
SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS | 2018年 / 16卷 / 11期
基金
英国科学技术设施理事会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
PRECIPITATION FORECASTS; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MODEL; VERIFICATION; VALIDATION; SKILL;
D O I
10.1029/2018SW002059
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Metrics are an objective, quantitative assessment of forecast (or model) agreement with observations. They are essential for assessing forecast accuracy and reliability and consequently act as a diagnostic for forecast development. Partly as a result of limited spatial sampling of observations, much of space-weather forecasting is focused on the time domain rather than inherent spatial variability. Thus, metrics are primarily point-by-point approaches, in which observed conditions at time tare compared directly (and only) with the forecast conditions at time t. Such metrics are undoubtedly useful. But in lacking an explicit consideration of timing uncertainties, they have limitations as diagnostic tools and can, under certain conditions, be misleading. Using a near-Earth solar wind speed forecast as an illustrative example, this study briefly reviews the most commonly used point-by-point metrics and advocates for complementary time window approaches. In particular, a scale-selective approach, originally developed in numerical weather prediction for validation of spatially patchy rainfall forecasts, is adapted to the time domain for space - weather purposes. This simple approach readily determines the time scales over which a forecast is and is not valuable, allowing the results of point-by-point metrics to be put in greater context.
引用
收藏
页码:1847 / 1861
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1982, Aust. Meteor. Mag.
  • [2] [Anonymous], AIP C P AIP
  • [3] [Anonymous], J ATMOS SOL THER
  • [4] 3D Polarized Imaging of Coronal Mass Ejections: Chirality of a CME
    DeForest, C. E.
    de Koning, C. A.
    Elliott, H. A.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 850 (02)
  • [5] INTERPLANETARY MAGNETIC FIELD AND AURORAL ZONES
    DUNGEY, JW
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1961, 6 (02) : 47 - &
  • [6] Toward Better Understanding of the Contiguous Rain Area (CRA) Method for Spatial Forecast Verification
    Ebert, Elizabeth E.
    Gallus, William A., Jr.
    [J]. WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2009, 24 (05) : 1401 - 1415
  • [7] Finley J.P., 1884, AM METEOROLOGICAL J, V1, P85
  • [8] Validation for global solar wind prediction using Ulysses comparison: Multiple coronal and heliospheric models installed at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center
    Jian, L. K.
    MacNeice, P. J.
    Mays, M. L.
    Taktakishvili, A.
    Odstrcil, D.
    Jackson, B.
    Yu, H. -S.
    Riley, P.
    Sokolov, I. V.
    [J]. SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 14 (08): : 592 - 611
  • [9] Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field data
    King, JH
    Papitashvili, NE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2005, 110 (A2)
  • [10] Magnetohydrodynamic modeling of the solar corona during Whole Sun Month
    Linker, JA
    Mikic, Z
    Biesecker, DA
    Forsyth, RJ
    Gibson, SE
    Lazarus, AJ
    Lecinski, A
    Riley, P
    Szabo, A
    Thompson, BJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1999, 104 (A5) : 9809 - 9830