Suppression of LIM Kinase 1 and LIM Kinase 2 Limits Glioblastoma Invasion

被引:23
作者
Chen, Joseph [1 ]
Ananthanarayanan, Badriprasad [1 ]
Springer, Kelsey S. [1 ]
Wolf, Kayla J. [1 ,2 ]
Sheyman, Sharon M. [1 ]
Tran, Vivien D. [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Sanjay [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Bioengn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] UC Berkeley UC San Francisco Grad Program Bioengn, Berkeley, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TUMOR-INITIATING CELLS; ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; COFILIN ACTIVITY; CANCER; MIGRATION; INHIBITORS; DYNAMICS; METASTASIS; REGULATOR; HYDROGEL;
D O I
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1237
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aggressive brain tumor glioblastoma (GBM) is characterized by rapid cellular infiltration of brain tissue, raising the possibility that disease progression could potentially be slowed by disrupting the machinery of cell migration. The LIM kinase isoforms LIMK1 and LIMK2 (LIMK1/2) play important roles in cell polarization, migration, and invasion and are markedly upregulated in GBM and many other infiltrative cancers. Yet, it remains unclear whether LIMK suppression could serve as a viable basis for combating GBM infiltration. In this study, we investigated effects of LIMK1/2 suppression on GBM invasion by combining GBM culture models, engineered invasion paradigms, and mouse xenograft models. While knockdown of either LIMK1 or LIMK2 only minimally influenced invasion in culture, simultaneous knockdown of both isoforms strongly reduced the invasive motility of continuous culture models and human GBM tumor-initiating cells (TIC) in both Boyden chamber and 3D hyaluronic acid spheroid invasion assays. Furthermore, LIMK1/2 functionally regulated cell invasiveness, in part, by disrupting polarized cell motility under confinement and cell chemotaxis. In an orthotopic xenograft model, TICs stably transduced with LIMK1/2 shRNA were implanted intracranially in immunocompromised mice. Tumors derived from LIMK1/2 knockdown TICs were substantially smaller and showed delayed growth kinetics and more distinct margins than tumors derived from control TICs. Overall, LIMK1/2 suppression increased mean survival time by 30%. These findings indicate that LIMK1/2 strongly regulate GBM invasive motility and tumor progression and support further exploration of LIMK1/2 as druggable targets. Significance: Targeting the actin-binding proteins LIMK1 and LIM K2 significantly diminishes glioblastoma invasion and spread, suggesting the potential value of these proteins as therapeutic targets.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 78
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] LIM kinase 2 is widely expressed in all tissues
    Acevedo, K
    Moussi, N
    Li, R
    Soo, P
    Bernard, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 54 (05) : 487 - 501
  • [2] Elucidating the mechanobiology of malignant brain tumors using a brain matrix-mimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform
    Ananthanarayanan, Badriprasad
    Kim, Yushan
    Kumar, Sanjay
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 2011, 32 (31) : 7913 - 7923
  • [3] LIM kinase 1 increases tumor metastasis of human breast cancer cells via regulation of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator system
    Bagheri-Yarmand, R
    Mazumdar, A
    Sahin, AA
    Kumar, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 118 (11) : 2703 - 2710
  • [4] The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain
    Beadle, Christopher
    Assanah, Marcela C.
    Monzo, Pascale
    Vallee, Richard
    Rosenfeld, Steven S.
    Canoll, Peter
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2008, 19 (08) : 3357 - 3368
  • [5] Aligned Nanotopography Promotes a Migratory State in Glioblastoma Multiforme Tumor Cells
    Beliveau, Alexander
    Thomas, Gawain
    Gong, Jiaxin
    Wen, Qi
    Jain, Anjana
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [6] The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma
    Brennan, Cameron W.
    Verhaak, Roel G. W.
    McKenna, Aaron
    Campos, Benito
    Noushmehr, Houtan
    Salama, Sofie R.
    Zheng, Siyuan
    Chakravarty, Debyani
    Sanborn, J. Zachary
    Berman, Samuel H.
    Beroukhim, Rameen
    Bernard, Brady
    Wu, Chang-Jiun
    Genovese, Giannicola
    Shmulevich, Ilya
    Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill
    Zou, Lihua
    Vegesna, Rahulsimham
    Shukla, Sachet A.
    Ciriello, Giovanni
    Yung, W. K.
    Zhang, Wei
    Sougnez, Carrie
    Mikkelsen, Tom
    Aldape, Kenneth
    Bigner, Darell D.
    Van Meir, Erwin G.
    Prados, Michael
    Sloan, Andrew
    Black, Keith L.
    Eschbacher, Jennifer
    Finocchiaro, Gaetano
    Friedman, William
    Andrews, David W.
    Guha, Abhijit
    Iacocca, Mary
    O'Neill, Brian P.
    Foltz, Greg
    Myers, Jerome
    Weisenberger, Daniel J.
    Penny, Robert
    Kucherlapati, Raju
    Perou, Charles M.
    Hayes, D. Neil
    Gibbs, Richard
    Marra, Marco
    Mills, Gordon B.
    Lander, Eric
    Spellman, Paul
    Wilson, Richard
    [J]. CELL, 2013, 155 (02) : 462 - 477
  • [7] The cBio Cancer Genomics Portal: An Open Platform for Exploring Multidimensional Cancer Genomics Data
    Cerami, Ethan
    Gao, Jianjiong
    Dogrusoz, Ugur
    Gross, Benjamin E.
    Sumer, Selcuk Onur
    Aksoy, Buelent Arman
    Jacobsen, Anders
    Byrne, Caitlin J.
    Heuer, Michael L.
    Larsson, Erik
    Antipin, Yevgeniy
    Reva, Boris
    Goldberg, Arthur P.
    Sander, Chris
    Schultz, Nikolaus
    [J]. CANCER DISCOVERY, 2012, 2 (05) : 401 - 404
  • [8] Tapered Microtract Array Platform for Antimigratory Drug Screening of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme
    Cha, Junghwa
    Koh, Ilkyoo
    Choi, Yemuk
    Lee, Jungwhoi
    Choi, Chulhee
    Kim, Pilnam
    [J]. ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2015, 4 (03) : 405 - 411
  • [9] Brk activates Rac1 and promotes cell migration and invasion by phosphorylating paxillin
    Chen, HY
    Shen, CH
    Tsai, YT
    Lin, FC
    Huang, YP
    Chen, RH
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2004, 24 (24) : 10558 - 10572
  • [10] Biophysical regulation of cancer stem/initiating cells: Implications for disease mechanisms and translation
    Chen, Joseph
    Kumar, Sanjay
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 1 : 87 - 95