How inequality fuels climate change: The climate case for a Green New Deal

被引:69
作者
Green, Fergus [1 ]
Healy, Noel [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Polit Sci, London, England
[2] Salem State Univ, Geog & Sustainabil Dept, Salem, MA USA
来源
ONE EARTH | 2022年 / 5卷 / 06期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
INCOME INEQUALITY; ENERGY JUSTICE; CARBON EMISSIONS; POLICY; CORRUPTION; POLITICS; SUPPORT; CULTURE; CRISIS; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recent proposals in the US and elsewhere aim to tackle climate change and socioeconomic inequalities together through a Green New Deal (GND). GND proposals have been criticized by high-profile advocates of carbon-centric climate policies-advocates who do not perceive socioeconomic inequalities to be significant drivers of climate change and who argue that GNDs' wider agenda will undermine decarbonization efforts. Here, we show that socioeconomic inequalities drive emissions-intensive consumption and production, facilitate the obstruction of climate policies by wealthy elites, undermine public support for climate policy, and weaken the social foundations of collective action. This suggests that integrating certain carbon-centric policies into a wider program of social, economic, and democratic reforms would achieve decarbonization more effectively than carbon-centric policies alone. We show that common policy components of GNDs do indeed tackle the causal mechanisms by which inequalities fuel climate change, and we argue that GNDs enable more effective political strategies than carbon-centric policies.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 649
页数:15
相关论文
共 163 条
[71]   Income Inequality and Carbon Emissions in the United States: A State-level Analysis, 1997-2012 [J].
Jorgenson, Andrew ;
Schor, Juliet ;
Huang, Xiaorui .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 134 :40-48
[72]  
Kartha S., 2020, The Carbon Inequality Era: An assessment of the global distribution of consumption emissions among individuals from 1990 to 2015 and beyond
[73]  
Kedward K., 2022, Economic Policies for Sustainability and Resilience, P269, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-84288-87, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-84288-87]
[74]   The One Percent [J].
Keister, Lisa A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 40, 2014, 40 :347-367
[75]  
Kenner D, 2019, ROU FOC ENVIRON SUST, P1
[76]   White knights, or horsemen of the apocalypse? Prospects for Big Oil to align emissions with a 1.5 °C pathway [J].
Kenner, Dario ;
Heede, Richard .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 79
[77]   Decent living gaps and energy needs around the world [J].
Kikstra, Jarmo S. ;
Mastrucci, Alessio ;
Min, Jihoon ;
Riahi, Keywan ;
Rao, Narasimha D. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (09)
[78]   The role of trust in citizen acceptance of climate policy: Comparing perceptions of government competence, integrity and value similarity [J].
Kitt, Shelby ;
Axsen, Jonn ;
Long, Zoe ;
Rhodes, Ekaterina .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 183
[79]   Making carbon pricing work for citizens [J].
Klenert, David ;
Mattauch, Linus ;
Combet, Emmanuel ;
Edenhofer, Ottmar ;
Hepburn, Cameron ;
Rafaty, Ryan ;
Stern, Nicholas .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (08) :669-677
[80]   Who do you trust? How trust in partial and impartial government institutions influences climate policy attitudes [J].
Kulin, Joakim ;
Johansson Seva, Ingemar .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2021, 21 (01) :33-46