Drug therapy for delirium in terminally ill adults

被引:50
作者
Finucane, Anne M. [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Louise [3 ]
Leurent, Baptiste [4 ]
Sampson, Elizabeth L. [3 ]
Stone, Patrick [3 ]
Tookman, Adrian [5 ]
Candy, Bridget [3 ]
机构
[1] Marie Curie Hosp Edinburgh, 45 Frogston Rd West, Edinburgh EH10 7DR, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] UCL, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, Div Psychiat, London, England
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London, England
[5] Marie Curie Hosp, London, England
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2020年 / 01期
关键词
Antipsychotic Agents [therapeutic use; Chlorpromazine [therapeutic use; Delirium [*drug therapy] [etiology; Haloperidol [therapeutic use; Lorazepam [therapeutic use; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Terminally Ill [*psychology; Adult; Humans; RECEIVING PALLIATIVE CARE; DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL; ADVANCED CANCER; OPEN-LABEL; HALOPERIDOL; RISPERIDONE; MANAGEMENT; OLANZAPINE; EFFICACY; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD004770.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Delirium is a syndrome characterised by an acute disturbance of attention and awareness which develops over a short time period and fluctuates in severity over the course of the day. It is commonly experienced during inpatient admission in the terminal phase of illness. It can cause symptoms such as agitation and hallucinations and is distressing for terminally ill people, their families and staff. Delirium may arise from any number of causes and treatment should aim to address these causes. When this is not possible, or treatment is unsuccessful, drug therapy to manage the symptoms may become necessary. This is the second update of the review first published in 2004. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of drug therapies to manage delirium symptoms in terminally ill adults. Search methods We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Psycl INFO from inception to July 2019, reference lists of retrieved papers, and online trial registries. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials of drug therapies in any dose by any route, compared to another drug therapy, a non-pharmacological approach, placebo, standard care or wait-list control, for the management of delirium symptoms in terminally ill adults (18 years or older). Data collection and analysis We independently screened citations, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes were delirium symptoms; agitation score; adverse events. Secondary outcomes were: use of rescue medication; cognitive status; survival. We applied the GRADE approach to assess the overall quality of the evidence for each outcome and we include eight 'Summary of findings' tables. Main results We included four studies (three new to this update), with 399 participants. Most participants had advanced cancer or advanced AIDS, and mild- to moderate-severity delirium. Meta-analysis was not possible because no two studies examined the same comparison. Each study was at high risk of bias for at least one criterion. Most evidence was low to very low quality, downgraded due to very serious study limitations, imprecision or because there were so few data. Most studies reported delirium symptoms; two reported agitation scores; three reported adverse events with data on extrapyramidal effects; and none reported serious adverse events. 1. Haloperidol versus placebo There may be little to no difference between placebo and haloperidol in delirium symptoms within 24 hours (mean difference (MD) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.07 to 0.75; 133 participants).Haloperidol may slightly worsen delirium symptoms compared with placebo at 48 hours (MD 0.49, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.88; 123 participants with mild- to moderate-severity delirium). Haloperidol may reduce agitation slightly compared with placebo between 24 and 48 hours (MD -0.14, 95% -0.28 to -0.00; 123 participants with mild- to moderate-severity delirium). Haloperidol probably increases extrapyramidal adverse effects compared with placebo (MD 0.79, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.41; 123 participants with mild- to moderate-severity delirium). 2. Haloperidol versus risperidone There may be little to no difference in delirium symptoms with haloperidol compared with risperidone within 24 hours (MD -0.42, 95% CI -0.90 to 0.06; 126 participants) or 48 hours (MD -0.36, 95% CI -0.92 to 0.20; 106 participants with mild- to moderate-severity delirium). Agitation scores and adverse events were not reported for this comparison. 3. Haloperidol versus olanzapine We are uncertain whether haloperidol reduces delirium symptoms compared with olanzapine within 24 hours (MD 2.36, 95% CI -0.75 to 5.47; 28 participants) or 48 hours (MD 1.90, 95% CI -1.50 to 5.30, 24 participants). Agitation scores and adverse events were not reported for this comparison. 4. Risperidone versus placebo Risperidone may slightly worsen delirium symptoms compared with placebo within 24 hours (MD 0.76, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.22; 129 participants); and at 48 hours (MD 0.85, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.38; 111 participants with mild- to moderate-severity delirium). There may be little to no difference in agitation with risperidone compared with placebo between 24 and 48 hours (MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.09; 111 participants with mild- to moderate-severity delirium). Risperidone may increase extrapyramidal adverse effects compared with placebo (MD 0.73 95% C10.09 to 1.37; 111 participants with mild to moderate-severity delirium). 5. Lorazepam plus haloperidol versus placebo plus haloperidol We are uncertain whether lorazepam plus haloperidol compared with placebo plus haloperidol improves delirium symptoms within 24 hours (MD 2.10, 95% CI -1.00 to 5.20; 50 participants with moderate to severe delirium), reduces agitation within 24 hours (MD 1.90, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.80; 52 participants), or increases adverse events (RR 0.70, 95% CI -0.19 to 2.63; 31 participants with moderate to severe delirium). 6. Haloperidol versus chlorpromazine We are uncertain whether haloperidol reduces delirium symptoms compared with chlorpromazine at 48 hours (MD 0.37, 95% CI -4.58 to 5.32; 24 participants). Agitation scores were not reported. We are uncertain whether haloperidol increases adverse events compared with chlorpromazine (MD 0.46, 95% CI -4.22 to 5.14; 24 participants). 7. Haloperidol versus lorazepam We are uncertain whether haloperidol reduces delirium symptoms compared with lorazepam at 48 hours (MD -4.88, 95% CI -9.70 to 0.06; 17 participants). Agitation scores were not reported. We are uncertain whether haloperidol increases adverse events compared with lorazepam (MD -6.66, 95% CI -14.85 to 1.53; 17 participants). 8. Lorazepam versus chlorpromazine We are uncertain whether lorazepam reduces delirium symptoms compared with chlorpromazine at 48 hours (MD 5.25, 95% CI 0.38 to 10.12; 19 participants), or increases adverse events (MD 7.12, 95% CI 1.08 to 15.32; 18 participants). Agitation scores were not reported. Secondary outcomes: use of rescue medication, cognitive impairment, survival There were insufficient data to draw conclusions or assess GRADE. Authors' conclusions We found no high-quality evidence to support or refute the use of drug therapy for delirium symptoms in terminally ill adults. We found low-quality evidence that risperidone or haloperidol may slightly worsen delirium symptoms of mild to moderate severity for terminally ill people compared with placebo. We found moderate- to low-quality evidence that haloperidol and risperidone may slightly increase extrapyramidal adverse events for people with mild- to moderate-severity delirium. Given the small number of studies and participants on which current evidence is based, further research is essential.
引用
收藏
页数:86
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]   Efficacy of Oral Risperidone, Haloperidol, or Placebo for Symptoms of Delirium Among Patients in Palliative Care A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Agar, Meera R. ;
Lawlor, Peter G. ;
Quinn, Stephen ;
Draper, Brian ;
Caplan, Gideon A. ;
Rowett, Debra ;
Sanderson, Christine ;
Hardy, Janet ;
Le, Brian ;
Eckermann, Simon ;
McCaffrey, Nicola ;
Devilee, Linda ;
Fazekas, Belinda ;
Hill, Mark ;
Currow, David C. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 177 (01) :34-42
[2]  
[Anonymous], GUID ASS TREATM DEL
[3]  
[Anonymous], J PHARM CARE PAIN SY
[4]  
[Anonymous], WORKSH PREP SUMM FIN
[5]  
[Anonymous], DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[6]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004770
[7]  
[Anonymous], DEMENTIA NEUROPSYCHO
[8]  
[Anonymous], ANN INTERNAL MED
[9]  
[Anonymous], 10 WORLD RES C EUR A
[10]  
[Anonymous], CCSMH GUID UPD ASS T